Earlier quoted context omitted.
CES did not say it was immoral, that was deceptive on the part of the author.
Their initial response was to cite the following text: > Entries deemed by CTA in their sole discretion to be immoral, obscene, indecent, profane or not in keeping with CTA’s image will be disqualified. CTA reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any entry at any time which, in CTA’s opinion, endangers the safety or well being of any person, or fails to comply with these Official Rules. So, if they di…
You left off the most obvious and least controversial option, “not keeping with CTA’s image” of course.
But it makes for a better outrage narrative if we cherry pick the most offensive interpretation possible.