Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't downvote but I think others might have because you leveled an allegation so vague as to be irrefutable. I think dang has been a great mod and have only seen the interactions that involve me, or have been upvoted. Doesn't mean I wouldn't be interested in seeing substantive criticism from those who've experienced differently.
It’s kind of hard to do. Almost certainly dang or another mod would rate limit or shadow ban me. It’s their site to do as they will, but it strikes me as interesting that they are held up as saints when they are anything but. Note that I’m not saying they are monsters either, but as someone on the receiving end of dang’s conduct I personally cannot agree with this post. It’s not like they are really accountable for t…
Thank you to dang and sctb
91–100 of 152 posts
Re: Thank you to dang and sctb
#92I think moderators are doing an excellent job to keep this forum decent and interesting.
Of course I also thank the people who make this forum and share interesting information.
Re: Thank you to dang and sctb
#93Their nicks don't ring a bell with me, and I've been here for ~2 years. Which probably means that what they're doing is a good thing though, not a lot of flame wars going on! (Or alternatively, I just stay away from articles that might cause need for more moderation). But thanks! Good mods are crucial for a place like this
Re: Thank you to dang and sctb
#94And for Arc too! http://arclanguage.org/forum Thanks Dan + Scott!
Re: Thank you to dang and sctb
#95Re: Thank you to dang and sctb
#96As a tribute to Dang, whose name you say when you make a mistake, here are some of my favorite Far Side cartoons: Some Weirdo: https://i.pinimg.com/564x/f8/74/40/f8744035e15d69eb8fd4c70de... Monster Jobs: https://i.pinimg.com/564x/21/81/3e/21813e975f2aa35259246eeca... Vultures: https://i.pinimg.com/564x/e4/d2/f3/e4d2f3b47c3de90e1a084d94a... Construction Birds at Lunch: https://i.pinimg.com/564x/3b/c5/fd/3bc5fd323e791…
Re: Thank you to dang and sctb
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s kind of hard to do. Almost certainly dang or another mod would rate limit or shadow ban me. It’s their site to do as they will, but it strikes me as interesting that they are held up as saints when they are anything but. Note that I’m not saying they are monsters either, but as someone on the receiving end of dang’s conduct I personally cannot agree with this post. It’s not like they are really accountable for t…
They're just regular mods. On a toxic one-up community. I'd like then to at least have a courtesy of mentioning when someone is (shadow) banned.
I am somewhat rate limited it seems for reasons but I won't complain. I'm possibly more annoying than them.
Re: Thank you to dang and sctb
#98as someone whose writing ends up on here from time to time, I really appreciate the HN mods' work to keep discussion on topic & constructive. It's obviously a tough job and every time I've emailed them with a concern they've been very helpful.
Re: Thank you to dang and sctb
#99Re: Thank you to dang and sctb
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can't say I've experienced this, he treated me pretty badly in the past. Most times he is OK though. By all means downvote me, btw. This backslapping post on the front page only wants to hear about how amazing the mods are, so the bias is pretty evident.
I vouched for (undeaded) your comment, since I think the flagging/downvoting runs contrary to the principles of discourse we're (at least implicitly) celebrating here, smelling of tribalism/favoritism. Just because you view someone favorably, and someone else claims something negative about that person, doesn't mean you just get to flagbomb them into oblivion. The right response here is simply to ask for further subs…
Downvoting something for complaining about votes is fairly normal. Downvote baiting on top is flagworthy. I imagine lots of people quite sensibly apply these as a matter of course.