Live data from Hacker News

China is laying the groundwork for a post-American world order

washingtonpost.com

91–94 of 94 posts

Re: China is laying the groundwork for a post-American world order

#91
post #84
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Nationalistic flamewar will get your account banned here. Can you please not post like this to HN? You did it elsewhere recently as well, which is a problem. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

fine

Re: China is laying the groundwork for a post-American world order

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17644657 > The Uighurs see themselves as a minority facing cultural, religious and economic discrimination. When Xinjiang was incorporated into the People's Republic of China in 1949, they comprised roughly 80 percent of the region's population. Controlled migration to Xinjiang of Han Chinese has reduced this share to 45 percent [..] > Anyone with a potentially suspicious data tra…

> You don't have to bring democracy to China, just don't look the other way or even help rationalize and justify it. And isn't that exactly what most nations are doing ? Especially European countries and the EU, and more so as time goes on.

I'm not talking to nations. I'm talking to persons.

Re: China is laying the groundwork for a post-American world order

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Things are way too early to call on North Korea. I saw this today: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-sp...

I saw that too :( Still, Trump has gotten further than any president before him. My whole point was this “burning bridges” and general miasma around Trump’s foreign policy is the result of ideology and hysteria instead of hard nosed observation of facts.

>My whole point was this “burning bridges” and general miasma around Trump’s foreign policy is the result of ideology and hysteria instead of hard nosed observation of facts.

Part of the "stature" involves how he publicly treats officials from other countries and how he presents himself to the world.

This is what led Angela Merkel (and other world leaders) to repeatedly denounce Trump. Theresa May almost laughed when Trump suggested that she sue the EU and it's by far not the most stupid thing he's said.

No president does 100% bad things, but the problem is that with every success that he does have, he can't articulate it well because 30% of his vocabulary solely consists of the word 'very'. His reading and speaking level are barely above middle school. The only reason he's resorted to doing unpredictable, mad dog politics is that he isn't capable of doing anything else -- not because it's a good method of politics these days.

Does that get you things like trade deals because no one knows how you'll react? Sure, at the cost of reputation down the line.

Re: China is laying the groundwork for a post-American world order

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I saw that too :( Still, Trump has gotten further than any president before him. My whole point was this “burning bridges” and general miasma around Trump’s foreign policy is the result of ideology and hysteria instead of hard nosed observation of facts.

>My whole point was this “burning bridges” and general miasma around Trump’s foreign policy is the result of ideology and hysteria instead of hard nosed observation of facts. Part of the "stature" involves how he publicly treats officials from other countries and how he presents himself to the world. This is what led Angela Merkel (and other world leaders) to repeatedly denounce Trump. Theresa May almost laughed when…

This certainly seems like a cultural divide in America. Some people would prefer someone less effective, but whom was polite and proper. Others don't care about polite and proper as long as they are effective.

Some people didn't care that Trump called Jong-Un "rocketman" if it meant positive results. Others were horrified that Trump would ridicule a world leader in such a childish manner, even if it did lead to by far the best results of any president in the history of N. Korea/US relations.

Post reply on HN