Earlier quoted context omitted.
What you described is literally the same thing SouthPark makes fun of in the Sodosopa episodes. https://imgur.com/gallery/Xgea4Ot It's amazing how on the nose they are.
That's frighteningly close to the place I was referring to... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm5BOoS3ihA http://www.experienceavalon.com/ I just watched the video of "sodasopa". If they didn't have the South Park characters in it, I would have thought it was a real ad for either Avalon or one of the other areas in Atlanta.
A Look Back at Why Blockbuster Really Failed and Why It Didn't Have To (2014)
91–100 of 105 posts
Re: A Look Back at Why Blockbuster Really Failed and Why It Didn't Have To (2014)
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's frighteningly close to the place I was referring to... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm5BOoS3ihA http://www.experienceavalon.com/ I just watched the video of "sodasopa". If they didn't have the South Park characters in it, I would have thought it was a real ad for either Avalon or one of the other areas in Atlanta.
These days going to the mall has to be “an experience”. People don’t just buy things anymore, they want to have an “experience”
Re: A Look Back at Why Blockbuster Really Failed and Why It Didn't Have To (2014)
#93Blockbuster used to have a really crappy selection of mostly mainstream movies, but often it was one of the closest video rental stores around, as they seemed to be everywhere. They also censored and cut their movies, which was really annoying. I don't know what their agenda was on that front, and why they couldn't just let mature adults watch the full films. My friends and I used to much prefer going to independent…
> Most people these days don't seem to know that Netflix even has a DVD service A few years ago, Netflix was going to spin off the DVD Service as a separate company. I can't remember the name of it but it was kind of goofy I thought. For some reason they decided to pull back on that and they are still running it as a division within Netflix. However I have to imagine it doesn't make a lot of money compared to streami…
Re: A Look Back at Why Blockbuster Really Failed and Why It Didn't Have To (2014)
#94My girlfriend runs an independent video rental store. I've been thinking of ways to implement a streaming service for our extensive collection of physical DVDs from the store to customers in the local area, perhaps to a proprietary TV box. I have the skills to do this. Does anybody here know if this has ever been done, or is legal? I'm in BC, Canada.
Technical execution is the easy part, but legally speaking, you might fare much better by just offering to physically deliver movies on demand.
Re: A Look Back at Why Blockbuster Really Failed and Why It Didn't Have To (2014)
#95Blockbuster used to have a really crappy selection of mostly mainstream movies, but often it was one of the closest video rental stores around, as they seemed to be everywhere. They also censored and cut their movies, which was really annoying. I don't know what their agenda was on that front, and why they couldn't just let mature adults watch the full films. My friends and I used to much prefer going to independent…
> They also censored and cut their movies, which was really annoying This is a bizarre urban legend that I don't believe has ever been substantiated. Can you do so?
Re: A Look Back at Why Blockbuster Really Failed and Why It Didn't Have To (2014)
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not at all clear that it's 'to the public', when it's only being sent to the renter. But that won't stop you from getting charged anyway.
Feel free to consult a lawyer, but there are 2 parties to which the copyright act refers: the public and researchers. The definition of researchers is given in the act. The public is everybody else -- you, the renter, anyone else that isn't a researcher. The way it works is that the act outlines all of the circumstances in which copying could be infringing. It then defines infringement in section 2. In section 2 it s…
Re: A Look Back at Why Blockbuster Really Failed and Why It Didn't Have To (2014)
#97I don't think that social influence critical masses were really a factor here. Blockbuster was brick and mortar, and 'on demand from home at $10 a month' is going to kill that business on the basic fundamentals. There's no special science here. Blockbuster executives were fools - not so much to 'not see it coming' (few did) - but to not react when the writing was on the wall. Video streaming might be hard but it's no…
> Blockbuster was brick and mortar, and 'on demand from home at $10 a month' is going to kill that business on the basic fundamentals. That doesn't explain why Redbox managed to thrive though.
Re: A Look Back at Why Blockbuster Really Failed and Why It Didn't Have To (2014)
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
Feel free to consult a lawyer, but there are 2 parties to which the copyright act refers: the public and researchers. The definition of researchers is given in the act. The public is everybody else -- you, the renter, anyone else that isn't a researcher. The way it works is that the act outlines all of the circumstances in which copying could be infringing. It then defines infringement in section 2. In section 2 it s…
Does that mean two people watching a movie together are breaking that law?
Notable is 29.22 Reproduction for private purposes is allowed if
29.22 (1) (a) the individual legally obtained the copy of the work or other subject-matter from which the reproduction is made, other than by borrowing it or renting it, and owns or is authorized to use the medium or device on which it is reproduced;
So it seems that both the DVD and player must be legally owned by the person watching the movie. That means they must have the right to come in and walk away with the DVD and player at any time, just as if they had them in a data center. Seems reasonable. Just buy them back when they're done.
Note that Zediva didn't do this. Their DVDs and DVD players weren't actually owned by the customers, just rented, nor were customers allowed into the data center to repossess them. The US also didn't have the same private reproduction provision as in the Canadian Copyright Act does.
Re: A Look Back at Why Blockbuster Really Failed and Why It Didn't Have To (2014)
#99My girlfriend runs an independent video rental store. I've been thinking of ways to implement a streaming service for our extensive collection of physical DVDs from the store to customers in the local area, perhaps to a proprietary TV box. I have the skills to do this. Does anybody here know if this has ever been done, or is legal? I'm in BC, Canada.
https://www.wired.com/2011/08/zediva-shuts-down/ - Zediva tried that previously and it didn't end too well for them. Was and OK service but tech wise it was a bit clunky and not as good as netflix.
Re: A Look Back at Why Blockbuster Really Failed and Why It Didn't Have To (2014)
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Technical execution is the easy part, but legally speaking, you might fare much better by just offering to physically deliver movies on demand.
Reminds me of a promotion I saw a few years ago where some pizza chain had paired up with a video rental place. You ordered a DVD with your pizza and they were delivered together.