Capitalized as if it's a movie title, is strangely unsettling to me.
Darpa Literally Reinvented the Wheel for Army Combat Vehicles
91–100 of 220 posts
Re: Darpa Literally Reinvented the Wheel for Army Combat Vehicles
#92As a military officer, I pray these never make it past Test and Evaluation. They took essentially one part and turned it into 1000 parts. Anyone who has seen what 20 year old Marines do with these machines, let alone what happens in war, will appreciate that this is a fantastically horrible idea in a war zone. I need high reliability, not high zoot. Let NASA have high zoot.
Re: Darpa Literally Reinvented the Wheel for Army Combat Vehicles
#93As a military officer, I pray these never make it past Test and Evaluation. They took essentially one part and turned it into 1000 parts. Anyone who has seen what 20 year old Marines do with these machines, let alone what happens in war, will appreciate that this is a fantastically horrible idea in a war zone. I need high reliability, not high zoot. Let NASA have high zoot.
Re: Darpa Literally Reinvented the Wheel for Army Combat Vehicles
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
And how often do humvees get stuck anyway? I like the product, but it’s obviously wasteful. During the Iraq insurgency what was wanted was armor plating. Literally just 1/4” slabs of steel. This is of a piece with the F-35.
I saw one get stuck so bad in the sand it took three tanks to pull it out over in Saudi. Was sitting with the frame on the ground so no way to dig it out (trust me, they had us try).
A vehicle beached at the frame on sand is a very common occurrence in the desert, and it's fairly trivial to get out if you have a shovel, brains, and are physically well. It's just some work, but sand is incredibly easy to excavate by hand, even from underneath a vehicle.
Re: Darpa Literally Reinvented the Wheel for Army Combat Vehicles
#95Other than military applications. Looks like this could have potential for snow-bound vehicles. Ski areas and backcountry in the winter.
Re: Darpa Literally Reinvented the Wheel for Army Combat Vehicles
#96As a military officer, I pray these never make it past Test and Evaluation. They took essentially one part and turned it into 1000 parts. Anyone who has seen what 20 year old Marines do with these machines, let alone what happens in war, will appreciate that this is a fantastically horrible idea in a war zone. I need high reliability, not high zoot. Let NASA have high zoot.
Re: Darpa Literally Reinvented the Wheel for Army Combat Vehicles
#97As a military officer, I pray these never make it past Test and Evaluation. They took essentially one part and turned it into 1000 parts. Anyone who has seen what 20 year old Marines do with these machines, let alone what happens in war, will appreciate that this is a fantastically horrible idea in a war zone. I need high reliability, not high zoot. Let NASA have high zoot.
Concession: id be damned if I told you that we didn’t goose the new guy bending over the explosives from time to time.
Re: Darpa Literally Reinvented the Wheel for Army Combat Vehicles
#98Re: Darpa Literally Reinvented the Wheel for Army Combat Vehicles
#99As a military officer, I pray these never make it past Test and Evaluation. They took essentially one part and turned it into 1000 parts. Anyone who has seen what 20 year old Marines do with these machines, let alone what happens in war, will appreciate that this is a fantastically horrible idea in a war zone. I need high reliability, not high zoot. Let NASA have high zoot.
20 year olds vary. As a 20 year old in the military, I was elbows deep in the B-61 Mod 10 replacing radioisotopic thermoelectric generators. Concession: id be damned if I told you that we didn’t goose the new guy bending over the explosives from time to time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B61_nuclear_bomb
and upon further searching, this → https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_generator
I need to ask if thermoelectric generator was a part of the B61 nuclear bomb? Please explain.
Re: Darpa Literally Reinvented the Wheel for Army Combat Vehicles
#100As a military officer, I pray these never make it past Test and Evaluation. They took essentially one part and turned it into 1000 parts. Anyone who has seen what 20 year old Marines do with these machines, let alone what happens in war, will appreciate that this is a fantastically horrible idea in a war zone. I need high reliability, not high zoot. Let NASA have high zoot.
20 year olds vary. As a 20 year old in the military, I was elbows deep in the B-61 Mod 10 replacing radioisotopic thermoelectric generators. Concession: id be damned if I told you that we didn’t goose the new guy bending over the explosives from time to time.