Live data from Hacker News

Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA

craigslist.org

91–100 of 654 posts

Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA

#91

I am fucking sick and fucking tired of people interfering with the free choice of individuals in any effort to "fix" society and "help" people. Lawmakers and advocates, have some epistemic humility and acknowledge that your own perspective may be mistaken. Not everything is oppression. Not every activity is injustice. Sometimes, people just fucking disagree.

[deleted]

Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA

#92
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you're barking up the wrong tree. Even if you think it's all for show, this is a good way for Craigslist to use their ubiquity to lift FOSTA into the public eye. Nobody knows what FOSTA is much less the sort of impact it could have on their day to day. But I suspect Craiglist's legal team isn't a bunch of idiots when it comes to toeing the line of prostitution. They outlived websites like Redbook even though…

All platforms already restrict content they allow users to post, including CL. People still seem to express themselves freely despite those restrictions. That CL would make a vindictive stand in defense of sex trafficking specifically is just bizarre.

CL openly allowed prostitution on their site just yesterday.

I wouldn't be so quick to call it self-evident that there was a better response than to immediately shut down their classifieds.

I'm sure there's more to do than just flicking a "filter prostitution: yes / no" switch on their admin panel.

Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA

#93

Wow! I met my wife just over 7 years ago there, and our 2nd kid is due in a few months. Hard to believe that the personals section is gone.

It's definitely changed over the past 7 years, being filled with mostly escort/sugar baby ads in recent times.

Which only happened because they were first forced to close the previous escort sections several years ago.

Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA

#94
post #48

This is completely bizarre, we can't go down this route with the internet. It is madness.

Unfortunately we've had a very poor week for internet freedom. However much of it has been the result of corporate overreach. This week: Reddit bans Cigar, beer and Alchohol trading subreddits, toy bb gun sales, and gun related coupon clippers Youtube (and facebook?) banned Channels featuring guns they deem inappropriate. Including videos regarding proper safety and maintenance. It has become clear to be that the int…

And just a few hours ago the Cloud Act passed as part of the Omnibus bill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLOUD_Act

Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA

#95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s completely limiting free choice and voluntary interactions between consenting adults. A huge personals section just got shut down. Unless you think 100% of personal ads are coerced sex trafficking, which would be rather crazy opinion. If you truly wanted to curb sex trafficking, you’d legalize prostitution, not drive it farther underground.

How... does that follow? To reduce slavery, legalize prostitution? There must be some steps in between I am missing.

Legal prostitutes can call the police for help from pimps or others trying to abuse or coerce them, without fear of arrest.

Legal prostitutes are incentivized to work with the police to report others being coerced, it’s competition.

Bringing things out into the open helps clean them up. Keeping them in the dark allows evil to multiply. The next time Prohibition helped the people it was trying to protect will also be the first time.

Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA

#96

It seems this and the new Youtube/Reddit bans would push more of this communication to the dark web and/or other private communication channels. I don't think I am comfortable with that. But, hopefully it leads to more support and push for privacy and decentralization. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-21/youtube-b... https://motherboard.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/ne9v5k/reddit...

There is something to be said for making a discouraged activity harder to do. Yes, it pushes these people underground but in a sense that is good as it makes it harder for them and harder to access them. In return it’s not much harder for authorities to infiltrate and there’s less non-illicit activity to filter. Not perfect, but it’s not always bad.

It increases the sexual abuse of marginalized women statistically.

Legal brothels have much lower rates of abuse.

Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA

#97
post #48

This is completely bizarre, we can't go down this route with the internet. It is madness.

Unfortunately we've had a very poor week for internet freedom. However much of it has been the result of corporate overreach. This week: Reddit bans Cigar, beer and Alchohol trading subreddits, toy bb gun sales, and gun related coupon clippers Youtube (and facebook?) banned Channels featuring guns they deem inappropriate. Including videos regarding proper safety and maintenance. It has become clear to be that the int…

>This week: Reddit bans Cigar, beer and Alchohol trading subreddits, toy bb gun sales, and gun related coupon clippers

Reddit also banned subs that were used for sourcing marijuana, designer drugs, xanax.. direct deals onsite.

i'm not defending the drug war, but when you only include the subs you wrote the move looks really silly. if people were only doing giveaways and trading toy bb guns, those subs would still be open. the fact is reddit was being used by vendors for direct deals of illegal shit, and in order to put that to a stop reddit had to ban all sourcing.

Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA

#98

This is not surprising, but sad. Years ago, i was dragged (i was the only engineer in the local office) into a whitehouse (or maybe it was state department, i can't remember) sponsored working group on online sex trafficking. The non-profits dedicated to fighting this, while seemingly well-intentioned, were completely and totally unwilling to see any other perspective or try to find shared ground. It was scorched ear…

It's taken this long because it took until now for people to start falling out of love with the tech industry, including many politicians. Having Wyden in their pocket won't be enough anymore. The skepticism of the tech industry is surprisingly bipartisan, which bodes well on a number of fronts including antitrust scrutiny and potentially the equivalent of GDPR (if we're lucky).

Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s completely limiting free choice and voluntary interactions between consenting adults. A huge personals section just got shut down. Unless you think 100% of personal ads are coerced sex trafficking, which would be rather crazy opinion. If you truly wanted to curb sex trafficking, you’d legalize prostitution, not drive it farther underground.

How... does that follow? To reduce slavery, legalize prostitution? There must be some steps in between I am missing.

Right now prostitution is associated with sex trafficking because it is illegal. There is no legal way to do the world's oldest profession.

If prostitution was legal and well-regulated like it is in many countries, then workers would have to be documented, they'd get workers' rights, etc. There are people willing to do sex work of their own free will, and if you create a normal market for it, then people will not resort to illicit, lower-quality secondary markets dependent on sex trafficking.

Here's the analogy: to reduce drug violence, legalize drugs.

Re: Craigslist takes personals sections offline in response to FOSTA

#100
I just read the text of this bill. The way it reads, the entire online dating industry should be closing its doors...tonight. CEOs of these companies face penalties of up to 25 years in prison. Why were there not massive protests over this? I had never heard of this bill before today.
Post reply on HN