Live data from Hacker News

Tell HN: Slack decides to close down IRC and XMPP gateways

news.ycombinator.com

91–100 of 624 posts

Re: Tell HN: Slack decides to close down IRC and XMPP gateways

#91
post #76

Is Mattermost a viable alternative, and is it possible to bridge it with IRC and XMPP?

Mattermost has bridges[1]. There's also Matrix[2] which is decentralised and has bridges for almost everything.

[1]: https://github.com/42wim/matterbridge [2]: https://matrix.org/

Re: Tell HN: Slack decides to close down IRC and XMPP gateways

#92
post #83
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Here's a thought: how about you write a native app for each platform? I can guarantee that the hundreds, if not thousands, of engineers working on AppKit and Windows APIs are a lot better at getting this to work than your team. Not just that, but it took them months to implement some (mind you, still not all) features that are useful for blind users that someone already did in a userscript in a few days. So yeah, I…

Not to mention that Chromium takes a performance hit when accessibility is on – that's why it's off by default. But both Safari and native Mac apps are always accessible.

Well, in this case I was quite glad that they have targeted the web platform. At least that allows me to code my own stopgap solution using userscripts and stuff. That's harder for native.

Re: Tell HN: Slack decides to close down IRC and XMPP gateways

#93

Slack was fine, now it is time to move back to IRC. Some people like slack or telegram because they provide an API for BOTs. Something IRC has been open to since the begining. Non power users might have trouble using IRC with the usual clients (mIRC/irssi/bitchx). Today a family member, not technical and 60+yrs asked about "that tool" that is like whatsapp however it allows users that just joined a group to read old…

Besides that, if slack had IRC enabled and e2e you would be able to connect via IRC and actually verify that e2e is doing its job (ie. connect via irc and see scrambled texts).

One problem with all these closed client apps slack (with this update)/whatsapp/telegram is that there is no way to verify/audit it is actually doing proper e2e.

Users must trust the X company that they are really doing proper e2e.

These apps should allow users to download a plugin and use that to produce the e2e. Then the user would be able to download an open sourced audited plugin that encrypts the messages before they hit the whatsapp/slack/telegram company servers.

So for instance, if this was possible, everyone on a group would download and install the plugin that runs on top of whatsapp/slack/telegram and share an encryption key that only they know about. And do the same for conversations between 2 people.

There must be some point of trust, however with the current situation, it is hard to trust e2e code no one is able to audit.

Or just open the protocol so everyone can use and create their own clients and their own e2e mechanisms. Which is what IRC is.

Re: Tell HN: Slack decides to close down IRC and XMPP gateways

#94
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Animated custom emojis seem to be a common thread, animated images in general cause my CPU and memory to spike when using slack. Our network engineer loves this dancing parrot emoji but it basically pins a core on my machine and adds 20-30% of memory to slacks process. I've switched over to using mattermost, it can be (and is) self hosted so I'm not as worried about slack getting hacked (again) and leaking our info/t…

For the curious, there's some history to that parrot emoji: http://cultofthepartyparrot.com

I wouldn't call that history. I only encountered a variant of this gif once, on a discord channel having the face of one of the two streamers. This site just shows me a lot of very similar gifs.

Re: Tell HN: Slack decides to close down IRC and XMPP gateways

#95
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're not basically electron apps. they _are_ electron apps. And it's completely absurd that mine is currently using 1514MB of memory. If I weren't required to use Slack on a day-to-day basis, I absolutely wouldn't solely on principle.

Weird, my slack app on windows is currently using 54MB.

Maybe it's closed? ;p

Re: Tell HN: Slack decides to close down IRC and XMPP gateways

#96
post #28
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're not basically electron apps. they _are_ electron apps. And it's completely absurd that mine is currently using 1514MB of memory. If I weren't required to use Slack on a day-to-day basis, I absolutely wouldn't solely on principle.

That's absurd. How is it so high? Mine uses around 700MB pretty consistently.

Are you insinuating 700MB for a chat app is sane?

Re: Tell HN: Slack decides to close down IRC and XMPP gateways

#97

Bitlbee will compensate.

As much I would love this, it looks like the only real option right now is wee-slack plugin for weechat. I have been using it for almost a year now and it does it's job very well. Bitlbee for hipchat, wee-slack for slack. I'm ok (for now, it's just a matter of time before slack cannot be used without one of their official clients like the shit that happened with whatsapp and others)

Re: Tell HN: Slack decides to close down IRC and XMPP gateways

#99

I'm very disappointed to see that Slack has decided to go the way of every other messaging service and move away from decentralized and standardized protocols towards those that are walled and proprietary. > We are focused on making Slack accessible to all people. Over the past year, we've made great progress in improving both the keyboard and screen reading experiences in Slack. We know many users have been relying…

Moxie Marlinspike has a blog post about why protocols like XMPP aren't good enough to support modern messaging apps. https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/ XMPP is an example of a federated protocol that advertises itself as a “living standard.” Despite its capacity for protocol “extensions,” however, it’s undeniable that XMPP still largely resembles a synchronous protocol with limited support for rich medi…

And yet, this is what you can get today with several IRC clients already: https://twitter.com/irccloud/status/971416931373854721?s=21

IRCCloud is using only standard IRC features to implement their Slack gateway that offers all features of slack - including reactions and threads.

Federated protocols can move extremely quickly, I've seen that myself recently.

Re: Tell HN: Slack decides to close down IRC and XMPP gateways

#100

I'm very disappointed to see that Slack has decided to go the way of every other messaging service and move away from decentralized and standardized protocols towards those that are walled and proprietary. > We are focused on making Slack accessible to all people. Over the past year, we've made great progress in improving both the keyboard and screen reading experiences in Slack. We know many users have been relying…

>I'm very disappointed to see that Slack has decided to go the way of every other messaging service and move away from decentralized and standardized protocols If every major messaging service eventually does this maybe those decentralized and standardized protocols are the problem.

I don't have any data to back this up, however, I suspect that standard protocols leaving little room for vendor lock in is the primary driver behind the closed systems we're seeing today rather than some inherent limitations open protocols.

(I'm not saying the current open protocols are perfect, or even close, however - 100s of closed chat protocols have been built and rebuilt - that effort would have been better spent in the open IMO. Obviously, investors and similar business functions see things differently though.)

Post reply on HN