Live data from Hacker News

An Open Letter to the FCC

medium.com

91–100 of 222 posts

Re: An Open Letter to the FCC

#91
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's wait and see where he ends up. If he doesn't immediately go back to telecom after his appointment is over, then I'll agree bringing up his history wasn't warranted.

I'm curious, where would you expect someone with years of experience in a specific industry to go after public office? Besides public office, of course.

Yeah, it's the obvious choice for him, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't set up perverse incentives.

Re: An Open Letter to the FCC

#92
post #18

Can Congress pass legislation to make net-neutrality something that the FCC cannot touch? If that's the case, it might be possible to pass such a law when(if) dems take over the House/Senate next year right?

> Can Congress pass legislation to make net-neutrality something that the FCC cannot touch? Yes, if they have support of the President or a veto-proof supermajority in both houses. > If that's the case, it might be possible to pass such a law when(if) dems take over the House/Senate next year right? Unlikely, for the reasons stated above, though tying it to something the President isn't willing to veto might work. Or…

Or, also within the realm of possibility, Trump flip flops on his positions to side with the Dems, just because he doesn't want to be seen as being out of power.

Re: An Open Letter to the FCC

#93
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(not) surprisingly, republicans have all but disappeared from that chat. at the federal level, both parties only care about state rights when it suits them.

Gun laws, abortion, the trans bathroom thing in NC...all recent issues that the GOP sided on states rights vs. federal regs On healthcare policy in particular the state specific policies continue to be enforced by the GOP. These aren’t positions I agree with btw I’m just pointing out recent examples. I think it’s fair to say Democrats would rather have centralized healthcare, gun laws, lgbt policies, and abortion acc…

I don't think those are good examples of states' rights legislation. Just because some NC Republican state Senators enacted a bathroom bill doesn't necessarily mean those Senators think the issue should be left to the states to decide, they could well prefer that their bathroom bill be made federal policy. Pushing legislation at the state or local level instead of federal can simply be a strategic decision rather than an ideological one.

If US Senators pass bill that explicitly delegates something to the states to decide, that's an example of states rights. If US Senators back a bill that explicitly overrides state laws, that's an example of federal regulation.

(It's actually interesting that you bring up the bathroom bill, because it actually is an example of centralizing power. The bill explicitly prevented local and city governments from adopting a different policy. Just an interesting aside.)

> I think it’s fair to say Democrats would rather have centralized healthcare

Obamacare specifically allows individual states to choose whether or not to participate in Medicaid expansion, and gives the money for Medicaid directly to the states to use as they see fit. That's a pretty clear example of states rights in action.

Re: An Open Letter to the FCC

#94
post #75

Are there any legitimate arguments for anti-net neutrality proponents? Or is it just more "republicans prefer less regulations"?

You can hear Pai defend his position here: http://reason.com/blog/2017/11/21/ajit-pai-net-neutrality-po... He claims that 80% of smaller ISPs have said that they delayed investment in infrastructure due to the costs associated with the net neutrality regs, and also that there was a reduction in overall broadband investment in the last two years and that has never happened before, outside of a recession. He thinks tha…

I don't really understand how net neutrality can hurt smaller ISPs. Net neutrality just prevents ISPs from using certain monetization schemes. It's not like you have to buy special equipment for net neutrality reasons, or maintain records to prove you're compliant, right?

Re: An Open Letter to the FCC

#95

The revocation of the Net Neutrality rules became a foregone conclusion once Donald Trump was elected. The sad reality is there's not much we, Eric Schneidermann or anyone else can do about it. There are 5 FCC commissioners but only 3 may be of the same party. Ajit Pai, Brendan Carr and Michael O'Rielly are locks to vote in favor, so it will pass, 3-2. At this point the best thing people can do is prepare to vote in…

Most commissioners for all sorts of branches/govmt arms come from the private sector...

However, being from Verizon is noticeable.

Re: An Open Letter to the FCC

#96

I wonder what it would take to really create ISP competition in the US? I thought I remembered seeing somewhere that the big ISP's use the legal system to essentially drive up entrance costs for smaller players. Would the EFF be able to help with something like that? The only real long term solution to stuff like this is more competition, because without it you never have the option to "vote with your wallet."

All we really need is municipal fiber. Then ISP's would just be connecting towns/areas, and the barrier to entry would be a lot lower if necessary.

Re: An Open Letter to the FCC

#97

The revocation of the Net Neutrality rules became a foregone conclusion once Donald Trump was elected. The sad reality is there's not much we, Eric Schneidermann or anyone else can do about it. There are 5 FCC commissioners but only 3 may be of the same party. Ajit Pai, Brendan Carr and Michael O'Rielly are locks to vote in favor, so it will pass, 3-2. At this point the best thing people can do is prepare to vote in…

> FCC Chairman Ajit Pai is a former Verizon lawyer He worked in their legal department for 2-3 years 15 years ago. All of his other time has been spent has a public servant. People need to stop bringing this up, because it only muddies the actual policy debate.

It’s relevant regardless of tenure or history because all indications are that he votes for Verizon’s interests, not the public’s.

Re: An Open Letter to the FCC

#98

The revocation of the Net Neutrality rules became a foregone conclusion once Donald Trump was elected. The sad reality is there's not much we, Eric Schneidermann or anyone else can do about it. There are 5 FCC commissioners but only 3 may be of the same party. Ajit Pai, Brendan Carr and Michael O'Rielly are locks to vote in favor, so it will pass, 3-2. At this point the best thing people can do is prepare to vote in…

> FCC Chairman Ajit Pai is a former Verizon lawyer He worked in their legal department for 2-3 years 15 years ago. All of his other time has been spent has a public servant. People need to stop bringing this up, because it only muddies the actual policy debate.

Most commissioners for all sorts of branches/govmt arms come from the private sector...But-but Verizon!!!

ugh. No one ever bothers to bring up this document either, which isnt going away... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_Open_Internet_Order_2010

Re: An Open Letter to the FCC

#99

Are there any legitimate arguments for anti-net neutrality proponents? Or is it just more "republicans prefer less regulations"?

Listen to the latest "Fifth Column" podcast where they interview this "evil" Ajit Pai guy. I think he makes a strong case that regulating monopolies is the role of the FTC or state's attorney generals and not the FCC and there is no real market failure here. http://wethefifth.com/ https://play.radiopublic.com/the-fifth-column-analysis-comme...

> I think he makes a strong case that regulating monopolies is the role of the FTC

He's echoing the industry on this, the industry that has (succesfully, so far, though the full 9th Circuit will be rehearing the issue) also argued that the FTC is barred by law from regulating them.

Here's the position.

To the FCC: “You shouldn't regulate anti-competitive behavior in our industry, even as a means to serve the clear and precise purposes the FCC is given in statute, because competition in general is the FTC’s job.”

To the FTC: “You can't regulate anti-competitive behavior in our industry, because most major participants are common carriers whether or not broadband is a Title II service, and you are prohibited from regulating common carriers even in their non-common-carrier activities, and any regulation you adopted that only applied to non-common-carrier participants would just concentrate more power in the common carriers.”

Re: An Open Letter to the FCC

#100

The revocation of the Net Neutrality rules became a foregone conclusion once Donald Trump was elected. The sad reality is there's not much we, Eric Schneidermann or anyone else can do about it. There are 5 FCC commissioners but only 3 may be of the same party. Ajit Pai, Brendan Carr and Michael O'Rielly are locks to vote in favor, so it will pass, 3-2. At this point the best thing people can do is prepare to vote in…

You're rather convinced Trump belongs to big telecom...i'd suggest more skepticism and waiting and seeing.
Post reply on HN