> Musk also tweeted that production would increase "exponentially," with 100 cars in August, more than 1,500 in September and 20,000 per month in December. Finally, someone who says things will grow exponentially and actually means it!
I just worry how many cars they'll be producing in 5 years time.
Tesla's Long-Awaited, Lower-Priced Model 3 to Arrive Friday
91–100 of 124 posts
Re: Tesla's Long-Awaited, Lower-Priced Model 3 to Arrive Friday
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also curious about this. Tesla has the ability to to hoard millions of hours of driving experience per year. Data seems to trump all in ML applications so far and Tesla definitely has the most available to harvest. At the same time, Tesla is primarily video based and it is likely quite difficult to call home with gigabytes of video every night.
That's pretty clearly part of the long term play
If you use data given to you by your users, you should have to release it into the public domain.
Re: Tesla's Long-Awaited, Lower-Priced Model 3 to Arrive Friday
#93> Musk also tweeted that production would increase "exponentially," with 100 cars in August, more than 1,500 in September and 20,000 per month in December. Finally, someone who says things will grow exponentially and actually means it!
1st month: factor of 15 (100->1500) 2nd+3rd month: factor of 13.333/2 =6.6 (1500->20000)
This is logarithmic, growth is slowing down rapidly.
Re: Tesla's Long-Awaited, Lower-Priced Model 3 to Arrive Friday
#94I just wonder, how much bandwidth these cars send home (Tesla HQ) as learning data.
Also curious about this. Tesla has the ability to to hoard millions of hours of driving experience per year. Data seems to trump all in ML applications so far and Tesla definitely has the most available to harvest. At the same time, Tesla is primarily video based and it is likely quite difficult to call home with gigabytes of video every night.
"Of course, the bandwidth varies based on what network it’s being sent from – meaning that some owners can track their home network, but not the data sent from the in-car cellular connection, which is covered by Tesla and managed by AT&T in the US."
[0]https://electrek.co/2017/06/14/tesla-autopilot-data-floodgat...
Re: Tesla's Long-Awaited, Lower-Priced Model 3 to Arrive Friday
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, I live in Germany. I have the same discussion roughly every month on HN[1]. No I'm not a reckless driver, I'm a family father that tries his best to drive safely. Just going 120km/h on the Autobahn in Germany is often times not the safest way. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14423002
You conjure a scenario where you're behind an unsafe driver who's going 130 km/h on the center lane, and you want to overtake him to get some distance from the source of danger. Can't do this if your car is only capable of driving at up to 130-140 km/h, true. The obvious -- and also the safest, in any car -- solution: just slow down. Switch to the right lane which invariably runs at around 80 to 90 km/h. Your nemesis…
Re: Tesla's Long-Awaited, Lower-Priced Model 3 to Arrive Friday
#96It's arriving Friday and they still haven't released official photos of the interior nor have any options configurations. Really odd way to launch a vehicle. https://www.tesla.com/model3
The first model 3's won't have any extra options, Musk made that clear a while ago by discussing the wrong release of the X with too many options that ended up backing up the deliveries.
Re: Tesla's Long-Awaited, Lower-Priced Model 3 to Arrive Friday
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think any car I've ever owned has spent more than a minute or two at its top rated speed. Even acceleration is only important up to a minimum to get along in traffic. Even in Germany where cars are allowed to go pretty quick in some areas hardly any of them go at or near their rated top speed.
True, because it takes long to actually get to that speed. But imagine if you'd like to drive 160 km/h on the highway all the time, you probably need a car that has a rated top speed of at least 180 km/h.
Re: Tesla's Long-Awaited, Lower-Priced Model 3 to Arrive Friday
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
True, because it takes long to actually get to that speed. But imagine if you'd like to drive 160 km/h on the highway all the time, you probably need a car that has a rated top speed of at least 180 km/h.
Then you would also buy a high end car. Model S, perhaps??
Re: Tesla's Long-Awaited, Lower-Priced Model 3 to Arrive Friday
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most of the (gas engine) cars sold today can go 180.
Most of the high end cars will go 225 or 249 (legal limit enforced by the engine firmware, also related to what the tires the car is sold standard with can handle). A small car doing 180 will not live long.
Re: Tesla's Long-Awaited, Lower-Priced Model 3 to Arrive Friday
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do live in Germany, and it is a concern for me. The VW e-up costs 22k EUR and has a top speed of 130 km/h, the BMW i3 full electric version w/o range extender costs about 35k EUR and has a top speed of 150 km/h. This performance would be fine if I bought a car under 10k EUR but not for this price.
Just adding more data: The 2017 Volt (Opel Ampera-e) has a top speed of about 160 km/h / 100 mph for 35k EUR, $33k USD Pretty sure the Model 3 can acheive this, if not be faster, since this is just the norm and not 'fast'.
But I usually switch into Hold mode (turns on the combustion engine) so I don't waste too much battery.
To be honest, the extra torque of an electric engine makes slow speeds seem faster. When I was in my diesel VW I found myself at 140-150km/h quite often by accident. In the Volt I'm comfortable going slower because it "feels" faster somehow.