Live data from Hacker News

Don't Become a Scientist.

wuphys.wustl.edu

91–94 of 94 posts

Re: Don't Become a Scientist.

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since one out of ten fail, that wouldn't be the best strategy.

Assuming you meant "9 out of 10 fail", and that the average failure takes a year, including recovery time at a real job to replenish your finances and find a new idea... That means you've had 6 chances just by the time your colleagues have finished grad school. 0.9^6 = 0.53, so you have a 47% chance of being a multi-millionaire by the time your academic friends are even entering the rat race. Compare that to the arti…

and plus, having started and failed at 5 startups, you learn a lot! your chances for the 6th one will definitely be higher than 10%.

Re: Don't Become a Scientist.

#93
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand the question.

Sorry, my question is: why are math researchers more independent than others?

What I meant is that as early as in grad school you start working entirely on your own and your advisor is just that, advisor. He is not going to prove your theorems for you. As far as I know in other fields it takes a while to reach this level of independence.

Re: Don't Become a Scientist.

#94
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry, my question is: why are math researchers more independent than others?

What I meant is that as early as in grad school you start working entirely on your own and your advisor is just that, advisor. He is not going to prove your theorems for you. As far as I know in other fields it takes a while to reach this level of independence.

Thanks a lot for your reply; I'm starting studies on maths and I was very interested on this.
Post reply on HN