Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is presumably more money for PBS than they were getting before Their priority is not profit, but public service. Since this reduces the availability of their programming, it is a disservice to the public that supports them through taxes, regardless of how much richer they are now.
> Their priority is not profit, but public service. Since this reduces the availability of their programming, it is a disservice to the public that supports them through taxes, regardless of how much richer they are now. Public service can be defined many ways. Is it better to have less programming that is available on Netflix and Hulu or more programming that is available on Amazon? Amazon Prime has very wide reach,…
I understand they cannot neglect the broadcast TV segment, but this is nuts.
BTW, it's odd to me the Department of State doesn't see PBS as a powerful propaganda tool. It's your BBC.