Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rare words can make writing more efficient and enjoyable. But it doesn't always. To my ears: "I use language for two reasons:" Is better than "To me, language is wielded with dual intention" But I always enjoy the word "florid", even though it's not in the top 1000 words.
> "To me, language is wielded with dual intention" I've got to be honest. I actually prefer that one. Not for conveying meaning but it definitely sounds nicer -- as a though it were a part of a Shakespearean soliloquy.
The Controlled Natural Language of Randall Munroe's Thing Explainer [pdf]
91–94 of 94 posts
Re: The Controlled Natural Language of Randall Munroe's Thing Explainer [pdf]
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think it's possible to form non-trivial sentences without function words. But leaving out common content words could be interesting.
Someone wrote a 260 pages long novel without using a single word that contains the letter 'e'. That seems impossible to me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsby_%28novel%29
is a noir/fantasy story, its actual plot is the story's lack of 'e'.
It's amazing. It's difficult and confusing to follow the writing, but it's an amazing book.
Re: The Controlled Natural Language of Randall Munroe's Thing Explainer [pdf]
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
In this case the phrase is a more artistic way of describing the beginning of a fight. Think of "John set upon Mike angrily" as John set, or selected, Mike as his target. It's also a great example of the topic at hand because the same phrase could be used like "The book was set upon the table." Describing a book that was placed on a table. Each version uses the same common vocabulary, to describe wildly different thi…
Or phonetically similar / by moving a space: "John was set up on a date" - someone arranged a romantic encounter for John. "John was setup on a date" - on some specific day John was assembled. "John was set upon a date" - John assaulted a piece of fruit.
Re: The Controlled Natural Language of Randall Munroe's Thing Explainer [pdf]
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is also a common complaint about Simple English books written for English learners. The books claim to have a restricted vocabulary, but they cheat by using phrasal verbs. Their vocabulary includes verbs like put and set along with prepositions like up , with and upon . You can combine these to generate an enormous number of phrasal verbs like put up with , set upon and so on, which are normally considered to be…
I remember when I was studying English in the U.S. with other foreign students some years ago, when the topic was phrasal verbs the grades decreased for entire class. I am Brazilian, the class was composed most of South Koreans and Saudi Arabians.
But that doesn't mean that they'd necessarily correctly interpret (or produce) "work in" 'incorporate (in a narrative or plan), "work out" 'resolve (a problem); deduce (a solution or consequence); deliberately perform physical exercise', "work off" 'eliminate (a debt, obligation, or excessive food intake) through effort'.
And there are hundreds more of those combinations with meanings that need to be learned independently.