Live data from Hacker News

The Controlled Natural Language of Randall Munroe's Thing Explainer [pdf]

arxiv.org

91–94 of 94 posts

Re: The Controlled Natural Language of Randall Munroe's Thing Explainer [pdf]

#91
post #62
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rare words can make writing more efficient and enjoyable. But it doesn't always. To my ears: "I use language for two reasons:" Is better than "To me, language is wielded with dual intention" But I always enjoy the word "florid", even though it's not in the top 1000 words.

> "To me, language is wielded with dual intention" I've got to be honest. I actually prefer that one. Not for conveying meaning but it definitely sounds nicer -- as a though it were a part of a Shakespearean soliloquy.

I believe that's the nicest thing anyone has ever said about words I put on the internet.

Re: The Controlled Natural Language of Randall Munroe's Thing Explainer [pdf]

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think it's possible to form non-trivial sentences without function words. But leaving out common content words could be interesting.

Someone wrote a 260 pages long novel without using a single word that contains the letter 'e'. That seems impossible to me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsby_%28novel%29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Void (from the original _La Disparition_)

is a noir/fantasy story, its actual plot is the story's lack of 'e'.

It's amazing. It's difficult and confusing to follow the writing, but it's an amazing book.

Re: The Controlled Natural Language of Randall Munroe's Thing Explainer [pdf]

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In this case the phrase is a more artistic way of describing the beginning of a fight. Think of "John set upon Mike angrily" as John set, or selected, Mike as his target. It's also a great example of the topic at hand because the same phrase could be used like "The book was set upon the table." Describing a book that was placed on a table. Each version uses the same common vocabulary, to describe wildly different thi…

Or phonetically similar / by moving a space: "John was set up on a date" - someone arranged a romantic encounter for John. "John was setup on a date" - on some specific day John was assembled. "John was set upon a date" - John assaulted a piece of fruit.

"setup" is a noun form of "set up"

Re: The Controlled Natural Language of Randall Munroe's Thing Explainer [pdf]

#94
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is also a common complaint about Simple English books written for English learners. The books claim to have a restricted vocabulary, but they cheat by using phrasal verbs. Their vocabulary includes verbs like put and set along with prepositions like up , with and upon . You can combine these to generate an enormous number of phrasal verbs like put up with , set upon and so on, which are normally considered to be…

I remember when I was studying English in the U.S. with other foreign students some years ago, when the topic was phrasal verbs the grades decreased for entire class. I am Brazilian, the class was composed most of South Koreans and Saudi Arabians.

Phrasal verbs are a hidden problem for estimating English vocabulary competence (as was alluded to earlier in this thread), because they play serious havoc with the idea of "knowing" a word. If you asked English learners if they knew the meanings of "work", "in", "out", and "off", most would say yes at a pretty early stage of their English education.

But that doesn't mean that they'd necessarily correctly interpret (or produce) "work in" 'incorporate (in a narrative or plan), "work out" 'resolve (a problem); deduce (a solution or consequence); deliberately perform physical exercise', "work off" 'eliminate (a debt, obligation, or excessive food intake) through effort'.

And there are hundreds more of those combinations with meanings that need to be learned independently.

Post reply on HN