Does anyone here have a take on why so many people are forking VSCode instead of writing a plugin? Is AI codegen the kind of thing that would be impoasible with a plugin or something?
Google Antigravity
891–900 of 1001 posts
Re: Google Antigravity
#892Does anyone here have a take on why so many people are forking VSCode instead of writing a plugin? Is AI codegen the kind of thing that would be impoasible with a plugin or something?
For example a while back vscode-pets[1] plugin became popular and tried it and noticed that the pet can only live within a window, whether its the explorer section or in its own panel, I thought it'd be more of a desktop pet that could be anywhere within VSCode but apparently there are limitations (https://github.com/tonybaloney/vscode-pets/issues/4).
So my guess is that forking VSCode and customizing it that way is much easier to do things that you can't with a plugin while also not having to maintain an IDE/Text editor.
Re: Google Antigravity
#893Tangential I know but what a clumsy sounding name
The name "Google Antigravity" was chosen to convey the idea of making the software development process more weightless.
That's good because my arms were getting tired pushing code around in emacs everyday.Re: Google Antigravity
#894If I write "float exp(float base, float exp){"
Then that is the source code and the rest is generated. Mixing it all up is as dumb as uploading a compiled binary or bytecode to git.
Especially annoying when you are working with other people and you can't tell what they actually wrote and know about.
Re: Google Antigravity
#895I gave it a fair shot. It is a vs code fork. There were some UI glitches. Some usability was better. Cursor has some real annoying usability issues - like their previous/next code change never going away and no way to disable it. Design of this one looks more polished and less muddy. I was working on a project and just continued with it. It was easy because they import setting from cursor. Feels like the browser wars…
Oh ffs
Re: Google Antigravity
#896Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It is a vs code fork Google may have won the browser wars with Chrome, but Microsoft seems to be winning the IDE wars with VSCode
I wouldn't bet on an Electron app winning anything long-term in the dev-oriented space.
In order to build a web app, you will first need a web app
Re: Google Antigravity
#897Re: Google Antigravity
#898Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same here - completely relate. One thing I’ve noticed though that actually coding (without the use of AI; maybe a bit of tab auto-complete) is that I’m actually way faster when working in my domain than I am when using AI tools. Everytime I use AI tools in my domain-expertise area, I find it ends up slowing me down. Introducing subtle bugs, me having to provide insane amount of context and details (at which point it…
One AI workflow I rather like seems to have largely vanished from many modern tools. Use a very dumb simple model with syntax knowledge to autocomplete. It fills out what I'm about to type, and takes local variables and pass them to functions I wanna call. It feels like just writing my own code but at 50% higher wpm. Especially if I can limit it to only suggest a single row; it prevents it from effecting my thought p…
Re: Google Antigravity
#899Re: Google Antigravity
#900> “Google Antigravity's Editor view offers tab autocompletion, natural language code commands, and a configurable, and context-aware configurable agent.”
Is it a typo or was there a reason to add configurable twice?