It seems 'GPT-5 Pro' is not available via the API.
GPT-5
891–900 of 1001 posts
Re: GPT-5
#892Why do I have access to GPT-5 on only some of my devices? All logged into my plus account. My iPad ChatGPT shows 5, but my iPhone ChatGPT only allows 4o?
rollout is probably not user-specific, but device specific. Classic rookie mistake.
Re: GPT-5
#893It is frequently suggested that once one of the AI companies reaches an AGI threshold, they will take off ahead of the rest. It's interesting to note that at least so far, the trend has been the opposite: as time goes on and the models get better, the performance of the different company's gets clustered closer together. Right now GPT-5, Claude Opus, Grok 4, Gemini 2.5 Pro all seem quite good across the board (ie the…
LLMs won't probably be the models for "super intelligence".
But nowdays, how corpos can "justify" their R&D to spend gigantic amount of resources (time + hardware + energy) in models which are not LLMs?
Re: GPT-5
#894Does this mean AGI is cancelled? 2027 hard takeoff was just sci-fi?
But but but my tech bro CTO said grok IS AGI
Re: GPT-5
#895I'm not really convinced, the benchmark blunder was really strange but the demos were quite underwhelming, and it appears this was reflected by a huge market correction in the betting markets as to who will have the best AI by end of the year. What excites me now is that Gemini 3.0 or some answer from Google is coming soon and that will be the one I will actually end up using. It seems like the last mover in the LLM…
Polymarket betters are not impressed. Based upon the market odds, OpenAI had a 35% chance to have the best model (at year end), but those odds have dropped to 18% today. (I'm mostly making this comment to document what happened for the history books.) https://polymarket.com/event/which-company-has-best-ai-model...
After a few hours with gpt-5, I'd trade that spread. Not that I think oAI will win end of year. But I think gpt5 is better than it looks on the benchmark side. It is very very good at something we don't have a lot of benchmarks for -- keeping track of where it's at. codex is vassstly better in practice than claude code or gemini cli right now.
On the chat side, it's also quite different, and I wouldn't be surprised if people need some time to get a taste and a preference for it. I ask most models to help me build a macbook pro charger in 15th century florence with the instructions that I start with only my laptop and I can only talk for four hours of chat before the battery dies -- 5 was notable in that it thought through a bunch of second order implications of plans and offered some unusual things, including a list of instructions for a foot-treadle-based split ring commutator + generator in 15th century florentine italian(!). I have no way of verifying if the italian was correct.
Upshot - I think they did something very special with long context and iterative task management, and I would be surprised if they don't keep improving 5, based on their new branding and marketing plan.
That said, to me this is one of the first 'product release' moments in the frontier model space. 5 is not so much a model release as a polished-up, holes-fixed, annoyances-reduced/removed, 10x faster type of product launch. Google (current polymarket favorite) is remarkably bad at those product releases.
Back to betting - I bet there's a moment this year where those numbers change 10% in oAIs favor.
Re: GPT-5
#896Anecdotal review:
Been using it all morning. Had to switch back to 4. 5 has all of the problems that 2/3 had with ignoring any context, flagrantly ignoring the 'spirit' of my requests, and talking to me like I'm a little baby.
Not to mention almost all of my prompts result in a several minute wait with "thinking longer about the answer".
Re: GPT-5
#897The marketing copy and the current livestream appear tautological: "it's better because it's better." Not much explanation yet why GPT-5 warrants a major version bump. As usual, the model (and potentially OpenAI as a whole) will depend on output vibe checks.
For fun, I asked it how much better it is than GPT-4. It started a rap battle against itself :P
https://chatgpt.com/share/6895d5da-8884-8003-bf9d-1e191b11d3...
Re: GPT-5
#898GPT-5 knowledge cutoff: Sep 30, 2024 (10 months before release). Compare that to Gemini 2.5 Pro knowledge cutoff: Jan 2025 (3 months before release) Claude Opus 4.1: knowledge cutoff: Mar 2025 (4 months before release) https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/compare https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/pro/ https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models/overv...
It would be fun to train an LLM with a knowledge cutoff of 1900 or something
Not sure we have enough data for any pre-internet date.
Re: GPT-5
#899I'm extremely whelmed. I cancelled my subscription
Re: GPT-5
#900Wow, I just got GPT-5. Tried to continue the discussion of my 3D print problems with it (which I started with 4o). In comparison GPT-5 is an entitled prick trying to gaslight me into following what it wants. Can I have 4o back?
If we're going to be forced to trust a new model, might as well evaluate other companies as well to make a decision before my plan renews.