Live data from Hacker News

Omegle 2009-2023

omegle.com

891–900 of 1001 posts

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#891

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Think about all the infinite numbers of glitches that happened in the past and prevented you to meet other possible wives :)

I tell my wife that she and I always end up together in every multiverse, including the one where our relationship somehow causes that universe to collapse on itself (also that’s the same one where Hacker News is implemented as ASP.Net app)

What's wrong with ASP.NET? (MVC, not the travesty that is WebForms)

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#892

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Think about all the infinite numbers of glitches that happened in the past and prevented you to meet other possible wives :)

What if meeting the wife was the glitch?

I think realistically that's what it was. The odds were definitely not in our favour to meet.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#893

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If there is no incentive to operate the network, who will sustain the infrastructure? If there is no cost to using the system, how do you prevent spam abuse? This is what crypto solves. It doesn't have to be a get rich scheme, just issue tokens to those that run the network, and have users consume tokens when they send messages.

But it doesn't solve it; it just deters some of it. If all it takes is to pay money, you can wave your penis at anyone. A paid service applies a downward pressure on spam, sure, but you can't go without moderation.

I agree you still need some sort of moderation, but maybe you can ameliorate that too if you scale cost by reputation, and also let users filter by reputation. If you keep waving your penis at people, maybe soon the only people who end up talking to you are people who actually like it and volunteer moderators taking the money to see if you're worth reporting... I don't know, it'd be hard to get the balance right, and you'd need to effectively "punish" people with a fresh identity quite harshly at first or people would just keep starting over, but I'd love to see someone try to tackle it.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#894

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Think about all the infinite numbers of glitches that happened in the past and prevented you to meet other possible wives :)

I tell my wife that she and I always end up together in every multiverse, including the one where our relationship somehow causes that universe to collapse on itself (also that’s the same one where Hacker News is implemented as ASP.Net app)

So a nerdy Everything Everywhere All At Once

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#895

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn’t use Omegle much, but I actually met my now wife on there. We used the text only thing where a third person suggests a topic. Must’ve talked for a good 2 hours on there before exchanging informations, I shudder thinking that even the smallest glitch could have changed my life so drastically. We met 11 years ago on the platform, a completely random fluke. And while I haven’t really used Omegle in a long time,…

What was the suggested topic?

I don't fully remember, but I think it was about One Direction. We very quickly went off on tangents, but I think the feature was implemented so that the third person can spy on the messages but not interact in any way. I sometimes wonder how long they ended up staying in the conversation.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#896
post #658

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For people who are looking for this -- It's a common refrain on Twitter that Twitter can be a better dating app than actual dating apps. I think the mechanism here is similar -- both Twitter and Omegle encourage a sort of stream-of-consciousness, semi-anonymous communication style that facilitates soul entwinement.

I met my wife because she saw on facebook a screenshot someone has taken from a tweet I did about a terrorist attack. (Charlie Hebdo 2015- Paris). This encouraged her to read my blog then to get in touch, etc… So meeting my wife happened because: 1. There was a terrorist attack 2. I tweeted about it 3. The tweet became popular 4. A random someone took the time to screenshot it to share it on Facebook 5. That random s…

I shuffled a deck of cards, then spread it on the table. I looked at the cards and though to myself: what are the odds!

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#897

This is devastating. I have so many fond memories of meeting fellow weirdos over text. The days where StumbleUpon always took you somewhere exciting, cool, beautiful, interesting, funny, or novel. Where you looked at what people did with The Web 2.0 and only marveled at the possibilities of what could come. Truly feels like the death of one of the old guard, a Usenet-of-the-2010s. I even used it during pandemic times…

I miss the web where there were services actively trying to help you find new, interesting and weird things, not just the stuff that makes them the most money from ads. Feels like even the things that are supposed to be about "Discovery" are increasingly only showing you things from an ever shrinking walled garden. Despite there being exponentially more stuff and content on the web than say 20 years ago, it actually feels like a much smaller these days.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#898
post #695

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The chance of a small glitch or anything that did not happen in the past is as likely as a ghost dinosaur coming up to you and scamming you out of all your money. Looking at the past through a probabilistic lens is irrational, unless you are doing it to predict the future through information collection. Sort of, of topic but anyway….

I don't know why you were downvoted but it's true. My dad was almost scammed this past weekend. Or kind of scammed. The thing is that of a group of 200, 195 were scammed and he wasn't (or he was, but he got what he paid for in the end). And he wasn't just because a random event, he was very luck. I kept thinking in how lucky he was and how sad my family would be if he was part of the 195. But it didn't happen. Maybe…

I kept waiting for the part where the scammer turned out to be the ghost of a dinosaur.

Re: Omegle 2009-2023

#899
post #702

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And so now they’ll have to choose one of the other, even seedier bars. The kids aren’t any better off. You’ve made a poor analogy, though, since obviously it’s very trivial for a bar to validate age at the door. If such a thing were easy for Omegle to do, I’m sure they would.

If it’s trivial for a bar to validate, why not the same for a web site?

Seems like a good opening for a service that could validate your age for a low cost and provide a token good for logging on to adults-only sites.
Post reply on HN