Live data from Hacker News

Vaccinated Americans now may go without masks in most places, the CDC said

nytimes.com

881–890 of 925 posts

Re: Vaccinated Americans now may go without masks in most places, the CDC said

#881
post #865

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a political duopoly in this country that has a democracy-murdering stranglehold and barely anyone is aware of it.

Even thought it's the most obvious thing ever. It's really hard to understand as a bystander

this is a great summary: https://freakonomics.com/podcast/politics-industry/

Re: Vaccinated Americans now may go without masks in most places, the CDC said

#882
post #639

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> a slogan So it was a white lie?

Perhaps reality is too nuanced to fit into a single sentence? Or new information comes along that updates our understanding of the world?

It wasn't a single sentence. Articles, explainer videos, infographics etc. The goal was to force daily numbers and active hospitalizations below healthcare capacity. To smear out the infections across time. So instead of 2 weeks, it would be several months. The idea was that even if we can't reduce the total infections, we can prevent deaths if we reduce the load on hospitals. But people have extremely short memory span and nobody remembers anymore.

Re: Vaccinated Americans now may go without masks in most places, the CDC said

#883

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One must evaluate the consequences of not following a particular piece of advice. If masks work, and you don’t wear one, you are potentially killing people and worsening the pandemic. If they aren’t needed, and you do wear one anyways, no harm has been done.

I'm as pro-science (and progressive) as anyone, but under this logic you would have to wear a mask at all times for the rest of your life. This is just not reasonable. We have dealt with flus and other infections that kill people every year without feeling like we have a moral obligation to prophylactically wear a mask at all times, whether we feel sick or not. At some point the mandate needs to end.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27157672

I’m not proposing keeping the mandate.

Re: Vaccinated Americans now may go without masks in most places, the CDC said

#884

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps reality is too nuanced to fit into a single sentence? Or new information comes along that updates our understanding of the world?

It wasn't a single sentence. Articles, explainer videos, infographics etc. The goal was to force daily numbers and active hospitalizations below healthcare capacity. To smear out the infections across time. So instead of 2 weeks, it would be several months. The idea was that even if we can't reduce the total infections, we can prevent deaths if we reduce the load on hospitals. But people have extremely short memory s…

I remember it very well. Yep, they said flatten the curve. People did, there was confusion about masks, guidance changed. The president said some things about bleach, lockdowns, recession, NYC overloaded, stimulus, reopenings, public protests, Sturgis, peace in the middle east, vans picking up people off the street, elections, the Thanksgiving surge, hospitals full, Jan 6. So forgive me if I don't really put a lot of weight into what was initially said at the beginning of the pandemic. It reflected the understanding of the time.

As an aside, I'll just say I my opinion that it worked. With a few limited exceptions we didn't experience what India is doing through right now. I credit lockdowns and mask wearing for much of that.

Re: Vaccinated Americans now may go without masks in most places, the CDC said

#885

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It wasn't a single sentence. Articles, explainer videos, infographics etc. The goal was to force daily numbers and active hospitalizations below healthcare capacity. To smear out the infections across time. So instead of 2 weeks, it would be several months. The idea was that even if we can't reduce the total infections, we can prevent deaths if we reduce the load on hospitals. But people have extremely short memory s…

I remember it very well. Yep, they said flatten the curve. People did, there was confusion about masks, guidance changed. The president said some things about bleach, lockdowns, recession, NYC overloaded, stimulus, reopenings, public protests, Sturgis, peace in the middle east, vans picking up people off the street, elections, the Thanksgiving surge, hospitals full, Jan 6. So forgive me if I don't really put a lot of…

We are under lockdown for more than a year now to save old and obese people, most of whom would have died anyway in this year (or perhaps in Started as just a few weeks and became over a year and who know if next year will be back to normal...

Re: Vaccinated Americans now may go without masks in most places, the CDC said

#886

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember it very well. Yep, they said flatten the curve. People did, there was confusion about masks, guidance changed. The president said some things about bleach, lockdowns, recession, NYC overloaded, stimulus, reopenings, public protests, Sturgis, peace in the middle east, vans picking up people off the street, elections, the Thanksgiving surge, hospitals full, Jan 6. So forgive me if I don't really put a lot of…

We are under lockdown for more than a year now to save old and obese people, most of whom would have died anyway in this year (or perhaps in Started as just a few weeks and became over a year and who know if next year will be back to normal...

Oh I'm totally in favor of pushing fat granny in front of the trolley. Take the utilitarian approach! But it does kill younger people in lesser numbers, and potentially permanent damage to be people's brains, cardiovascular systems. What about them?

As an aside, my fat granny is watching my kids right now so she's not totally useless.

Re: Vaccinated Americans now may go without masks in most places, the CDC said

#887
post #783

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do the studies in the third category account for compliance? I wonder if we’re splitting hairs, so what if mask wearing is confounded with other voluntary measures of general caution? For me the take away is that some people take precaution, and some don’t.

One of the studies was an ecological study comparing mask wearing rates in many locales (some with compulsory requirements, and some without) and their change over time vs. disease growth rates. Another measured case growth in a hospital community where there was a very strictly enforced mandate for patients compared to the rate of case growth before, so compliance is a small factor. It's very likely that masks help.…

Your conclusions here don’t really seem in line with your comment about still not knowing if masks work.

Not sure why you feel like this is a worthy hair to split.

This kind of attitude is why the western response could have been better. Western medicine is hews rigorously close to the “do no harm” ideal and interpret it that you need to have conclusive evidence before recommending a treatment, even something as harmless as mask wearing.

In Asian countries they just do it and so what if it hasn’t been demonstrated as a causal factor in a dozen studies.

Lay people see the indecision, the hemming and hawing, the hand wringing.

The cdc says shit like people shouldn’t wear masks.

This shit is actively harmful and thousands of people have died because of it.

Re: Vaccinated Americans now may go without masks in most places, the CDC said

#888

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought with SARS-CoV-1, no people have it, but animals still do, and it could jump back to people from them, so it isn't considered eradicated yet. And stopping community spread in a few countries is totally different than global eradication.

Moving goalposts...

[deleted]

Re: Vaccinated Americans now may go without masks in most places, the CDC said

#889
post #854
post #287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think most probably have a more nuanced position than that. My personal hesitation is that people are just going to ignore the explicit condition of full vaccination. Worst case outcome could result in dragging the pandemic out and providing opportunity for new variants to develop. A concern closer to home is that this will increase risk for my parents, who have been hesitant about the mRNA vaccines and refuse J&J…

I'm not sure the cause of their concern with the J&J being produced with a fetal cell line, but the Catholic Church has some fairly vocal guidance on why the J&J vaccine is acceptable that address this. Also, for the mRNA vaccine, you may want to emphasize that this is the result of several decades of research, not a one-year crash program in new technology.

> the Catholic Church has some fairly vocal guidance on why the J&J vaccine is acceptable

The Catholic Church's position is that the J&J vaccine is acceptable if it's the only vaccine you can get, but you should not get it if any of the other vaccines are available to you. Your comment makes it sound like they consider it acceptable unconditionally, which isn't the case.

Re: Vaccinated Americans now may go without masks in most places, the CDC said

#890
post #599
post #597

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Look it's always been known since the very early days of Wuhan crisis that masks will significantly reduce spread and risk (from past smaller pandemics & the nature of transmission of this virus). The various health organizations simply decided to prioritize supply for the medical community till production could ramp up by making statements that dissuade people from panic buying (as happened with say Toilet paper and…

> Look it's always been known since the very early days of Wuhan crisis that masks will significantly reduce spread and risk (from past smaller pandemics & the nature of transmission of this virus) We have a lot of research into mask use, both to protect the wearer and to protect people around the wearer. Can you point to any that you think CDC should have been using to support mask wearing in the general public? You…

I'd argue it has always been known that masks would protect both patients and wearers even from first principles and also how past pandemics with a less infectious virus were handled in Asia and from how common cold and flu dropped as a side effect.

The virus spreads via droplets exhaled or emitted from nose and mouth. What happens when something obstructs that flow - the % of droplets going in & out & velocity decreases and likelihood of transmission reduces. Why do you think surgeons wear masks - it's both to protect the patient and the surgeon from droplet borne infections.

What was unknown was whether it was economical to wear masks widely and whether there were supplies, not that it would work.

Post reply on HN