Live data from Hacker News

Where things stand with the Department of War

anthropic.com

861–862 of 862 posts

Re: Where things stand with the Department of War

#861
post #501

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Need" defending? I couldn't care less who rules Ukraine, Taiwan, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Iran, and these countless other places half-way around the world. It's not like China taking over Taiwan will have any impact on semiconductors. They're happy to play merchant to the world, independent of allegiance. E.g. - Ukraine complains about China supplying Russia with tech for their drones, while failing to recognize t…

> I couldn't care less who rules Ukraine, Taiwan, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Iran Oh you will. You most certainly will.

No I won't. No I certainly won't. This nonsense is fun for shit posting on the internet but it literally does not matter. Countries are driven by self interest. If we wanted to stop dicking around in other country's affairs then we could be trade buddies with pretty much whoever we wanted with absolutely zero consequence to ourselves, and likely substantial benefit.

The thing about nukes, to say nothing of US geography, is that the chances of us being attacked is literally zero, unless it's a doomsday type nuclear bombardment affair. We don't even have to worry about things like a decapitation attempt since we're not surrounded by hostile military bases, or any other country's military bases for that matter.

Whatever the rest of the world wants to do - that's their problem. This isn't necessarily isolationist because I'm perfectly happy trading and engaging in any positive way with other nations, but this sort of 'nation building' and geopolitical crap we try to do just about always fails, and the few times it hasn't (like South Korea) is far more incidental than consequential. We left them with an endless series of awful dictators in charge and they somehow stumbled their way into becoming a half decent place, independent of us.

Re: Where things stand with the Department of War

#862

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's in the autocorrect dictionary usually has nothing to do with what you typically write. No reason to wonder (i.e. if the insinuation being that that's a word they'd typically use).

We could joke about the auto correct knowing your subconscious mind. Except if Facebook has auto correct, you can be sure it’s driven by a personal dossier on each of us, correlated by AI with every other person on the planet. They know you were thinking that word! The neverending benefits of personalization.

I see you have not met my (ex) sister in law. Alternatively, you have, and you are a much better (stronger? More stoic? More charitable? I don’t even know what it would take) man than I am. Hats off to you, and Godspeed!
Post reply on HN