Live data from Hacker News

US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana

apnews.com

861–870 of 918 posts

Re: US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana

#861
post #859
post #838

Earlier quoted context omitted.

""""The whole time that we were dating, he was also my boss at work, which created some awkward situations," she testified, according to The Wall Street Journal. Describing Bankman-Fried's attitude toward risk-taking, "Ellison recalled on the witness stand how Bankman-Fried once spoke of a coin-flip scenario where if the coin landed on tails, the world would end. But if the coin landed on heads, 'the world would be t…

So his girlfriend said it therefore he would even though there's no evidence to show he ever did? Have you used WikiLeaks? When was the last time it was consequencial or noteworthy? Here's a recent article with Julian assange. https://www.thenation.com/article/activism/julian-assange-wi... > He regrets that WikiLeaks is no longer able to expose war crimes and corruption as in the past. His imprisonment and US governm…

> So his girlfriend said it therefore he would even though there's no evidence to show he ever did?

That was simply the first search result. There's also the podcast interview:

https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-bankman-frie...

(If you're going to argue that 51% != 50%, you missed the point)

> Have you used WikiLeaks?

I've been to their website.

I've not had any reason to leak stuff.

Which do you mean?

> When was the last time it was consequencial or noteworthy?

You tell me: https://wikileaks.org/-Leaks-.html

> Here's a recent article with Julian assange

Feels like a double-standard, given how you're arguing about SBF.

"He regrets", "He fears".

Meanwhile: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=war+crimes&iar=news

And: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=corruption&iar=news

So, right back at ya: have you ever used any other news source besides WikiLeaks?

Re: US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana

#862
post #835

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes they do, for example lobbyists and donors and buddies want to get rich at the expense of the country and its people, and the common plebs don't want that.

Common plebs also include different people.

Good Lord, when did this happen?

Re: US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana

#863
post #851

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's more like having stoner friends and doing things with them has convinced me just how important it is that they aren't the ones driving. In fact, I'd say the same of anyone even people on traditional drugs.

It's essential to make responsible choices regarding substance use while driving. We all just have to be responsible

Or, even simpler, be responsible and don't use substances if you'll be driving.

Re: US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana

#864

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don’t bully people for smoking a plant. Easy.

Why? Society doesn’t owe you acceptance for your personal choices. For the vast majority of people, smoking marijuana is an anti-social choice that makes them a less productive member of society. Why should anyone have something other than a negative opinion of such a choice?

Judging people is wrong. This isn't a controversial statement.

Re: US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana

#865

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? Society doesn’t owe you acceptance for your personal choices. For the vast majority of people, smoking marijuana is an anti-social choice that makes them a less productive member of society. Why should anyone have something other than a negative opinion of such a choice?

Judging people is wrong. This isn't a controversial statement.

"Wrong" is a judgment. Why are you judging people for judging people?

Re: US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana

#866
post #672

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'd be surprised if people pretend the market is still rational: see nfts. Or the modern stock market. NFTs are an entertainment / art product. Them having non-zero value is the same as the original Mona Lisa selling for more than a perfect replica. What about the stock market are you darkly hinting at? > Not to mention the market irrationally rewards short term good (or even bad) and long term bad behavior, but it…

> NFTs are an entertainment / art product. Not strictly. It could also represent the ownership of a house. Usages like that are not widely-adopted, but NFTs are so much more than art.

> It could also represent the ownership of a house.

Yes, in theory they could. I was talking about real world NFTs we have so far encountered.

Re: US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana

#867
post #672

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'd be surprised if people pretend the market is still rational: see nfts. Or the modern stock market. NFTs are an entertainment / art product. Them having non-zero value is the same as the original Mona Lisa selling for more than a perfect replica. What about the stock market are you darkly hinting at? > Not to mention the market irrationally rewards short term good (or even bad) and long term bad behavior, but it…

Well, NFTs are worthless now and growth stock has expected growth priced in many years in advance. Predicting the future just use really hard. I'd argue that prices of things in the now are pretty rational.

Yes. Well, at least future price movements are hard to predict, because all the easy predictors are already priced in today.

Re: US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana

#868

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don’t bully people for smoking a plant. Easy.

Why? Society doesn’t owe you acceptance for your personal choices. For the vast majority of people, smoking marijuana is an anti-social choice that makes them a less productive member of society. Why should anyone have something other than a negative opinion of such a choice?

What if being productive to society is actually harmful?

Re: US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana

#869

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank god he was smart enough to avoid becoming a security guard, the natural path to thievery. But he is high every single moment at work by your reasoning, yes?

I’m not sure you even read the comment you were replying to. Click “parent” a few times and you’ll see “My brother got promoted to supervisor in a month for the simple reason that he is the only person who could wait until after work to get high.”

yeah and you missed the irony mocking that very comment

Re: US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana

#870

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank god he was smart enough to avoid becoming a security guard, the natural path to thievery. But he is high every single moment at work by your reasoning, yes?

I’m not sure you even read the comment you were replying to. Click “parent” a few times and you’ll see “My brother got promoted to supervisor in a month for the simple reason that he is the only person who could wait until after work to get high.”

I'm not sure you read your own words to try and see why everyone seems to not understand what it was you keep saying you meant.

"And since nearly everyone who works at a dispensary is high all day every day,"

Be careful in dealing in generalities and infinitives.by your own logic, your brother is simply an exception that proves a rule.

Your own words have worked harder against you than anything that any of these replies stated.

Post reply on HN