Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Renames to Meta

about.facebook.com

861–870 of 1001 posts

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#861
post #244

Other interesting things said during the keynote: "and frankly, as we've heard your feedback more broadly, we're working on making it so you can log into Quest with an account other than your personal Facebook account. We're starting to test support for work accounts soon, and we're working on making a broader shift here within the next year. I know this is a big deal for a lot of people. Not everyone wants their soc…

This is actually pretty big for me. I got a Rift a while back but it's been in a drawer ever since I needed to connect my FB account.

We just created a new account with a fake name. Happy so far with everything and we get to enjoy playing with no risk of info leaks.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#862
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For better or worse, it does seem Zuckerberg is as invested in making the "metaverse" the new future of Facebook as Jobs was with Apple and the iPhone

> For better or worse, it does seem Zuckerberg is as invested in making the "metaverse" the new future of Facebook as Jobs was with Apple and the iPhone I don't think we should take that at face value; Zuckerberg of course has strong motivations to appear completely committed, including a desire to motivate employees, partners, etc., and a desire to distract from FB's current bad news (which might explain the timing…

I mean... https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-to-hire-10-000-workers...

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#863

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> For better or worse, it does seem Zuckerberg is as invested in making the "metaverse" the new future of Facebook as Jobs was with Apple and the iPhone I don't think we should take that at face value; Zuckerberg of course has strong motivations to appear completely committed, including a desire to motivate employees, partners, etc., and a desire to distract from FB's current bad news (which might explain the timing…

I mean... https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-to-hire-10-000-workers...

Good point, but let's see what they actually do.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#864
I think Facebook (Meta) is swinging at a target that doesn't exist here. This is pie in the sky futurism. Sure, it is easier to build than flying cars, but it is nearly as fanciful.

I doubt they will suffer from the venture. However, I believe that the name change will result in a long-lasting sting to remind them of their failures.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#865
post #350

If there is going to be a metaverse, I'm not sure I want Facebook to own it. It's like a bad sci-fi pulp story. Given their investment and research, I wonder if they should open it all up (even if contradictory to short-term gains in ad revenue) so it has a chance to grow? Federate it a bit more than they are comfortable with, to at least give it a chance. I could see this flubbing out hard otherwise. I'm personally…

Virtual reality was always dystopian. It's what happens when we don't have a frontier and turn inward to computer aided fantasy and isolation. One of the best dystopian explanations for the Fermi paradox is that intelligences eventually figure out how to immerse themselves in high fidelity fantasy worlds and basically sit around and masturbate until some black swan event like a planet killer astroid or a gamma ray bu…

If those are the only three futures on offer then we should all subsidize PornHub's expansion into the metaverse promptly.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#868

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This isn't a statement about morals. I agree that no one cares about those. It's a statement that no one thinks "oh cool facebook" about literally anything they say or do. Their greatest successes in terms of social capital over the last decade have involved buying other companies. Maybe I'm in a bubble, but it seems while everyone uses Facebook to some extent... no one likes it.

Nobody likes anything. People hate Google, Reddit, etc but they still use it because it provides utility.

I like Google, especially for the work they're doing in the Dev space (eg Tensorflow), and I love Apple. People do like companies, to certain extents.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#869

If there is going to be a metaverse, I'm not sure I want Facebook to own it. It's like a bad sci-fi pulp story. Given their investment and research, I wonder if they should open it all up (even if contradictory to short-term gains in ad revenue) so it has a chance to grow? Federate it a bit more than they are comfortable with, to at least give it a chance. I could see this flubbing out hard otherwise. I'm personally…

> If there is going to be a metaverse, I'm not sure I want Facebook to own it. It's like a bad sci-fi pulp story.

No one should own it, the only non-dystopian metaverse would be open hardware and software and decentralized/p2p connectivity.

Post reply on HN