Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is very little value in knowing that some people disagree with a comment, but there is tremendous value in learning other ideas. This is a bad policy.
That's a good point. But let me ask you: do you think HN actually has this problem, i.e. of ideas being suppressed because people disagree? If so, I'd be curious to see examples. Most of the downvoted stuff I see has some other readily available explanation; usually some form of rudeness.
Coming Soon to Hacker News: Pending Comments
851–854 of 854 posts
Re: Coming Soon to Hacker News: Pending Comments
#852My may concern with this system: Sledgehammer meets tack. The comments on HN aren't perfect, but they're far from bad when compared to other sites of this nature. There has been a downwards trend most probably due to the increasing popularity of HN. A response is warranted. However, this system has the potential to silence a lot of high quality comments on any threads that aren't on the front-page for an extended per…
I agree with this entirely. As it currently stands, implementing this policy in such a abrupt way will hurt discussion and negatively impact the quality of the community. And although there are ways to improve the actual implementation of the system, I still think it is fundamentally flawed for a few reasons. First, any system in which a comment is assumed to be spam or trash until proven otherwise will produce less…
But a much higher percentage of people who actually post. The top 10 posts on this page (for me, right now) are about 50% from such users, and of the top 10 newcomments right now there's only 3 from users with 1000+ Karma, but several more from >900. If you're participating on the site for a while, it doesn't take that long.
Re: Coming Soon to Hacker News: Pending Comments
#853Has this pending comment policy has been implemented yet...?
Re: Coming Soon to Hacker News: Pending Comments
#854Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see it a lot. What's worse is up and down votes are a corrective mechanism. If you get downvoted, that kinda feels bad, if you get upvoted, that kinda feels good. It shapes your discussion and teaches you the rules of what the community finds acceptable/unacceptable. What is the honest to god pragmatic result of this policy? You're training people not to say something others disagree with. Even if you don't agree w…
> I see it a lot If so, you should be able to find three examples. Can I please see them? Specifically, three comments that aren't in any way rude, downvoted for expressing an unpopular view? The reason I'm curious is that I try to watch out for that, yet have only seen one comment recently which seemed to me downvoted purely for expressing an unpopular opinion, and even it was somewhat borderline. > You're training…
here:
this was 15 days ago.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7381397
> That's not true if most such comments get more upvotes than downvotes.
so it's not true were training people to keep unpopular opinions to themselves, because if those opinions will also be upvoted... because why? Because people don't agree with them? What?