How much equity in chevron will the federal gov get for this? 20% seems fair. Will BP want “their” fields back?
Trump personally gets the 20%
851–860 of 1001 posts
How much equity in chevron will the federal gov get for this? 20% seems fair. Will BP want “their” fields back?
Trump personally gets the 20%
1. This distracts from the Epstein files. 2. President for peace he never has (silly FIFA award aside). 3. They’re more interested in oil than any other stated goals. 4. This is straight out of the republican playbook of tanking the economy and using a war to distract from it and prop up defense contractors. 5. US regime changes are always a disaster.
Here's how to know if I'm right -- since this isn't high enough drama, he'll make it amp up by a factor of 1-5 with false-flag attacks on America or something else to try to create a real sense of emergency in the next year.
Reading through this thread is disturbing not because people disagree, but because of how the disagreement is happening. What I'm seeing is a breakdown in the ability to hold consistent principles across contexts. The same people who condemned Russian actions in Ukraine are now making "realpolitik" arguments about Venezuela. The same people who claim to oppose foreign intervention are now calculating whether this was…
And we wonder why rogue regimes seek nuclear weapons. My biggest concern in geopolitics is non-proliferation and every little thing we do like this works against it.
And we wonder why rogue regimes seek nuclear weapons. My biggest concern in geopolitics is non-proliferation and every little thing we do like this works against it.
The fruits have just ripened, and they're starting to harvest them.
If this is all true, then China has been pretty much given green light to invade Taiwan, in my opinion.
It's hard to think through the implications of living in a world where it is accepted that countries with more power simply invade each other and take land and possessions from those with less power. I can't think how it doesn't ultimately lead to broadscale instability and ultimately, war. In turn it depresses me that this is toxic to the humanity progressing and solving its bigger picture problems.
I’m sure it had nothing to do with oil too, just about democracy.
A lot of Venezuelans are happy about it. Maduro is not good for Venezuela. The US should not be the decider of who stays in power on another country. The president should not have the power to apprehend a countries president IN THEIR COUNTRY without a process thats more than just "I really want it". The US is giving another clear message that it does not care about global order, just global control. We're back in the…
Neither was doing that with other countries they ransacked. The other was pouring enough propaganda at you so that you think it is somehow different.
Replace Venezuela with Iraq, and Maduro with Saddam, and read this whole comment section. We never learn.
Yes, the recreational wars were dumb, wrong, illegal and just all around bad ideas.
But there was a solid attempt at giving them legitimacy. This matters.