Live data from Hacker News

Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act

github.com

831–840 of 1001 posts

Re: Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act

#831

We age gate the movie theater, so why is age gating a website or app any worse?

Have you given any movie theaters a permanent and persistent copy of your ID lately? Your phone number? Make them a list of anything and everything you've read about lately?

???

Re: Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act

#832
I don’t know why this isn’t a very simple Internet standard. The browsers on devices that have a child lock turned on could send an http header. People who have websites that are adult-only could configure their web server to check for that header and do something appropriate.

That requires cooperation, but since most adult websites don’t want children to be visiting them, cooperation shouldn’t be hard to get. Governments can pass a law and businesses can set a config flag. For uncooperative websites, child-locked devices can check a blacklist.

Then it’s up to parents to make sure their kids only have child-locked devices and for stores to not sell unlocked devices to kids. It’s never going to perfect, but it doesn’t doesn’t have to be to change community norms.

Re: Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act

#833

Has HN really stooped so low that we are upvoting unsourced AI slop? This “article” is sourced to a random Reddit thread and was clearly written by an LLM. > A Reddit researcher just exposed >The technical reality hits harder than policy abstractions. > Here’s where the lobbying gets surgical.

Ad hominem. If it’s clearly wrong then demonstrate.

It has been demonstrated as being wrong throughout this thread and the original threads about it.

The original report was AI slop from Claude Code. If you go to the repo it doesn’t even claim that Meta spent $2B, that’s just a sum of a lot of numbers Claude could find, not the number that Meta spent on lobbying this.

Re: Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act

#834

Has HN really stooped so low that we are upvoting unsourced AI slop? This “article” is sourced to a random Reddit thread and was clearly written by an LLM. > A Reddit researcher just exposed >The technical reality hits harder than policy abstractions. > Here’s where the lobbying gets surgical.

Ad hominem. If it’s clearly wrong then demonstrate.

It is actually not argumentum ad hominem, not least because this author is clearly not a person. It is extremely relevant to substance of this post that it was written by an LLM based on an anonymous Reddit commit (based on "reporting" itself written by Claude).

>If it’s clearly wrong then demonstrate.

Sorry, this does not work in the age of AI. If you don't bother writing your own words, then no one should bother responding to them.

Re: Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act

#835
post #723

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Just look at the freaking mess that is trying to proof your identity in the US. Care to elaborate? I'm not sure what's a mess about a driver's license, social security card. I've never once had any issue with my identity.

> I'm not sure what's a mess about a driver's license, social security card Neither of those are accepted by various states' voter id laws, nor can you reliably board an airplane with them since RealID. The only foolproof identity card in the US appears to be a passport (which, you know, global federal identity card... exactly what the folks against universal ids dislike)

> Neither of those are accepted by various states' voter id laws

You've made this up.

> nor can you reliably board an airplane with them since RealID.

That sounds like a problem that they created, and can choose to uncreate. I don't need to know the identity of people on planes any more than I need to know the identity of people in trains, buses, or taxis. "RealID" itself is dumb, and was the result of wearing down popular resistance for decades.

Re: Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act

#836
post #654

The question I keep coming back to regarding the recent debate around age verification is "Why now?" I'm 47, and I started using the internet in my early teens through BBS gateways. I've seen every age of the Internet, and there's always been widely available pornographic materials. Why all of a sudden is this a crisis? Perhaps I'm missing something?

The value of data increases year on year, even old data, but old data is worth much less than new. But for hyperscalers we've cost the threshold, now any data at all is worth more than storage space, and the profits are too much to ignore.

It's not just targeted advertising, though you can open youtube kids/instagram/tiktok and see plenty of that and age brackets happen to perfectly align with leaked metas' advertising brackets. (5-10, 10-12) (group A), 13-15 (group B), 16-17 (group C), 18-24, 24-30.

I think it's largely driven by the increasing computing power

Re: Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act

#837
post #776

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This seems like a very easy problem. The government has birth records, passports, ssn, phone records, etc. so they could provide an age bracket to anybody that needs it. But instead a private corporation will get to do this and create an absolute mess à la Palantir.

That requires a high level of trust in your current government and whomever is in charge in the future. Its worth remembering how the Nazis so efficiently found Jews in the Netherlands. The Dutch government kept meticulous records, including things like your name, address, and religious affiliation. That wasn't a big deal until the Nazis rolled in, throw in some level of Nazi sympathizers in the Dutch government and…

That's an argument against any mass collection/concentration of data in anyone's hands. Not against gov. collection of data in particular.

Re: Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act

#838

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please explain how opposition to privacy invasive solutions result in even more privacy invasive solutions being implemented? Is it purely out of spite from the lawmakers? This logic doesn't follow.

Ignoring the reality that some system of age (and ID verification, for certain tasks) system is desired by a significant portion of the population, and does have utility (despite the shouts for "just parent your children") is simply sticking your head in the sand. So by opposing any solution (even solutions that preserve privacy, like zero-knowledge), you make privacy concerns seem unreasonable and weaken stances opp…

> Ignoring the reality that some system of age ... system is desired by a significant portion of the population

How do you think this came to be?

Re: Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act

#839
post #776

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This seems like a very easy problem. The government has birth records, passports, ssn, phone records, etc. so they could provide an age bracket to anybody that needs it. But instead a private corporation will get to do this and create an absolute mess à la Palantir.

That requires a high level of trust in your current government and whomever is in charge in the future. Its worth remembering how the Nazis so efficiently found Jews in the Netherlands. The Dutch government kept meticulous records, including things like your name, address, and religious affiliation. That wasn't a big deal until the Nazis rolled in, throw in some level of Nazi sympathizers in the Dutch government and…

> That requires a high level of trust in your current government and whomever is in charge in the future.

Some entity has to be trusted with our data anyway, at least government supposed to have some accountability before the citizens, corporations have much higher incentives for profit.

Re: Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act

#840

I don’t know why this isn’t a very simple Internet standard. The browsers on devices that have a child lock turned on could send an http header. People who have websites that are adult-only could configure their web server to check for that header and do something appropriate. That requires cooperation, but since most adult websites don’t want children to be visiting them, cooperation shouldn’t be hard to get. Govern…

There is already a set of standards for this: websites can send content ratings to the browser, and the browser can choose not to show content on the basis of those ratings.

We don't need another one, especially one that inverts the polarity by having the browser proactively send information to the site.

Post reply on HN