Hiroshimoot must be sweating bullets
4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches
821–830 of 936 posts
Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches
#8224chan is still a thing? I thought it died long ago. Perhaps I grew up.
It is still there. There is a GPT that keeps it looking active and people that reply to it daily. For about 9 days after their most recent big hack it was nice and quiet. It would be a ghost town if not for the GPT using a 4chan pass and seychelles proxies. The /pol/ board is probably the most active with real humans trying to shock and awe people with fake racism and other edge-lord behavior. The real racist are on other sites. I would invite them here to prove what that really looks like but they would be ultra-shadow-banned instantly.
Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches
#823Earlier quoted context omitted.
afaik, prostitution is either legal or partially legal on the majority of Western countries. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries...
Normally its considered legal to sell but not legal to buy. Prostitution is primarily conducted by women, and this is a way for them to still seek protection and healthcare while still technically criminalising the practice.
Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches
#824Earlier quoted context omitted.
The evidence shows they don't have sufficient control. Parents these days clearly are unequal to the task, i'm passing no judgement just observing. >We don't put protections on kids walking out the front door My view is that we most certainly ban and/or heavily discourage children from entering certain places and talking to random strangers. There are many safeguards in the real world, there is simply not enough in t…
You seem to be under the impression that having held an opinion and changing it means the new opinion is better by default, but that's not true.
Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches
#825Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm moving away from that line of thinking. We can discuss how poorly formulated this law is, and the implications for privacy of internet control bills, and the resulting eroding of our freedom of speech. It's correct to be suspicous of attempts to regulate the internet. But I'm becoming increasingly convinced that "for the sake of the children" such measures are necessary. The reality is that most kids these days h…
So the solution is effective parental controls. Government mandated age verification isn't parental control, and is unlikely to be very effective. That means making it possible for parents to actively block bad websites, and making that hard to circumvent.
Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches
#826Earlier quoted context omitted.
This US regime isn't any different than the ayatollah, they also want christian sharia laws and to oppress women.
I wish you had traveled the world and would have seen whats really on the ground, instead of staying in your bubble and earlying out with a "everyone is just like me". The us is the most harmless empire that ever was. The most extreme case in the us evangelical bullshit is a daily buisness case.
Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches
#827Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which regime is trying to be changed though? The backlash to starting a war for no credible reason and tanking the world economy along with increased fuel prices could conceivably force a regime change in the USA.
The US regime is changing with the next presidential election regardless of the outcome (or lack thereof) of this war. Short of a nuclear exchange or China invading Taiwan or San Francisco, nothing is changing that.
Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches
#828Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're not though. They're lofting sanctions on Russia just to help try to survive this war.
It's not the first time I see comments similar to this and I honestly can't even begin to grasp how anyone can think that the US is in any way shape or form at risk from Iran .
Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches
#829At least in the US, you have 70+ year old lawmakers proposing (not even writing) laws they do not understand, passed to them by opaque groups with a obscured, albeit clear, interest.
See the latest age verification bills passed by Meta through a convoluted web of influence. Bring back the technocrats.
Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches
#830Earlier quoted context omitted.
She does if you want to keep doing business there. That's the stick that's available. Either you follow their laws despite not being in their jurisdiction or you can't sell to customers in Libya. I don't like it same as you because it makes doing business on the internet complicated but it's how it works in practice.
> you can't sell to customers in Libya Why though? Libya has no jurisdiction over my business in the EU. I place no restrictions on who can purchase a subscription on my SaaS. I certainly can sell to customers in Libya. All Libya can do is ban my business, but they can only implement that ban within their own sovereign borders.