Great model, but hitting the usage cap in 20 minutes makes it feel like a very expensive tech demo.
Claude Fable 5
811–820 of 1001 posts
Re: Claude Fable 5
#812Great model, but hitting the usage cap in 20 minutes makes it feel like a very expensive tech demo.
What subscription?
Re: Claude Fable 5
#813[dead]
Re: Claude Fable 5
#814It's getting harder to review the plans with Fable. So do we plan with Opus and let Fable implement or just start trusting blindly. Feels to me that this is another shift in how we operate these systems.
Re: Claude Fable 5
#815Claude Opus is already close to unusable for me. On the standard plan, the usage limits are so low that I can’t do almost anything agentic meaningful with it. Sure, it does last a lot more when asking simple questions about the repo and doing simple surgical fixes. But as soon as I start doing bigger tasks that need plans written, it just exhausts the limits too fast (and unlike codex, if it’s in a middle of a task,…
I agree, the $20 plan really feels like a rip-off (and I'm not even using Claude Code! only chat).
Re: Claude Fable 5
#816I am a PhD student in Computational Biology, essentially just doing statistics on some biological data. By now some of the things I am working on have found its way to Claude's memory so literally any chat with Fable gets immediately flagged.
Oh... I was wondering why every single chat (including "Hello") was being flagged.
Seems I am barred from using Fable just for being a biologist :(
Re: Claude Fable 5
#817I've spent enough time with this now in Claude Code (and Claude.ai and Claude Code for web) to have an opinion on Fable 5: it's a beast. I'm throwing some VERY difficult problems at at - things I've been dragging my heels on for months - and it's crunching through them very happily. One that I'm willing to share (albeit from just a week ago) - I built a Python library last week that bundles MicroPython compiled to WA…
> It's possible Opus or GPT-5.5 could have done this too, I've not tried the exact same sequence. The Fable vibes are good here, though. And that's the thing. These comparisons are all gut feelings. I'm missing objective unbiased measurements to actually have real comparisons between different models, their different generations, or even just the convention that everybody adds "you are an expert software engineer" an…
[deleted]
Re: Claude Fable 5
#818This is a goodbye. "We will require 30-day retention for all traffic on Mythos-class models, on both first- and third-party surfaces."
Re: Claude Fable 5
#819Holy shit. I gave it the first actual task I’m facing, it makes me so angry. It just does 7 things more than I asked it fore and it does it so bad. It took 5 minutes and 5 seconds just running time, plus giving me frustration and make me lose my context. Hand-coded I would’ve been done in 3. And it would be code I understand can look at in one year and work on again.
It’s really tough to have sanity fight against hype bros in your head. Probably I should just not visit the internet anymore
To me it’s all just people getting scammed better. With every model it looks better, but it’s at least equally worse to work with, which is the reality it needs to be. It’s less scalable more, code, tougher to understand. Your digging your own grave better kind of.
Re: Claude Fable 5
#820This is a goodbye. "We will require 30-day retention for all traffic on Mythos-class models, on both first- and third-party surfaces."
How else are they going to justify giving out this gigantically profitless model? They must train on your data on the premise of safety.