Live data from Hacker News

LinkedIn is searching your browser extensions

browsergate.eu

811–820 of 836 posts

Re: LinkedIn is searching your browser extensions

#811

The claims made on the website linked here are plain wrong. The person behind them is subject to an account restriction for scraping and other violations of LinkedIn’s Terms of Service. To protect the privacy of our members, their data, and to ensure site stability, we do look for extensions that scrape data without members’ consent or otherwise violate LinkedIn’s Terms of Service. Here’s why: some extensions have st…

Can you please state your name for the record?

The Bavarian Central Cybercrime Prosecution Office in Bamberg has opened a investigation into this matter (Case File No 650 UJs 2809/26) and I am sure they are interested in talking to you.

They would love to hear how this is all plain wrong.

Re: LinkedIn is searching your browser extensions

#812

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's all so tiring. What's tiring is a comment like this. If you don't like the article don't read it -- and don't comment.

One cannot make an accurate assessment of liking or disliking an article without having read the article.

The OP's complaint is literally about a one-sentence paragraph, the second in the article. Plenty of warning to avoid the rest and move on, but LLM shaming is it's own reward perhaps?

Re: LinkedIn is searching your browser extensions

#813
post #655

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There's no viable "grassroots" solution to the problem, it needs to come from regulation. Managers need to serve time in prison, No, yes Yes, giving these people short (or long, mēh) prison sentences is the only thing that will stop this. No, the obvious grassroots response is to not use LinkedIn or Chrome. (You mean developers not consumers, I think. The developers in the trenches should obey if they need their jo…

Yes, what I meant was there's no way ICs will change any of this. Using this or that extension, or choosing not to use some service won't really change anything either. The popular appetite just isn't there. Personally I use a variety of adblockers and haven't had a linkedin or anything for many years, but I fully accept that's an extremist position and most consumers will not behave that way. The only way these comp…

> The popular appetite just isn't there.

Cory Doctorow, if he is to believed, states 50% of web users use ad blockers. So maybe?

Re: LinkedIn is searching your browser extensions

#814

”American-Israeli cybersecurity firm.” Feels like a dogwhistle to people who don’t like Israelis. Hardly relevant if the cybersecurity firm is Israeli, Canadian or Australian.

It's extremely relevant given Israel's long history of extra-territorial assassinations and kidnappings.

The moment in history where we all pretend that Israel is a normal country has been and gone.

Re: LinkedIn is searching your browser extensions

#815
post #323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

E-ink is getting cheaper and cheaper, there's a lot of 6" screen devices for $100. If it dropped to $100 for a 11" screen, that would be a respectable size for a magazine. I cite eink as most are distraction free, or can be, and are very easy on the eyes. Such content would also suck with flashy ads too. It's pretty easy tech I think, it's just never hit a flash point. But it could.

You miss the point. We literally had all of this. We had regular, affordable, high quality printed media for every hobby and interest and industry, that you could get delivered to your home address and collect in your own archive if you want, and your local library could do the same. Those pieces of paper could not track anything about you. They tried, selling their subscriber lists, but that was the best tracking th…

You miss the point.

Hardly. I'm the guy upthread, lamenting the current state of things.

But with e-ink, you can be detached. Knowing someone buys a newspaper is hardly a surprising thing. To put it in perspective, a large number of people subscribed to the paper, and it was delivered daily. The same was true of magazines subscriptions. As long as the media is offline (eg, PDF, epub, similar), and the reader OSS, then the tracking and ads aren't an issue still.

--

I don't disagree with how poor things are, but one issue is government moves slowly. Laws being passed today, are the result of trends 20 years ago. For example, in my legal jurisdiction, vendors (eg, Best Buy, big box stores) are responsible for the thing they sell. It's not just "ship it back to manufacturer", for obvious reasons.

Eventually the issues with e-trade will be dealt with, just as issues with shoddy sellers were deal with a century ago. Here's an example...

Back in the 50s people would send items through the mail, then demand people pay for them, or pay for return shipping. I'm not kidding. Even when it wasn't easily defensible in civil court, all the legal threats would scare some into paying.

So laws were passed. If you receive something in the mail you didn't order? It's yours. Period.

But this took a decade to happen, if not more.

This is the sort of thing which will happen in this new market.

And yes, Amazon sucks as it is now.

It's really quite fascinating to me how a lot of new markets aren't about novel, but instead about not having terrible behaviour regulated. For example, Amazon has the worst customer service in all existence. It used to be good, but they now take immense pains to hide all support channels, and where I live, it's a maze of incomprehensible clicks to even attempt to get a chat.

So... I have to call now. Every time. And now they have the same wall of "noise" on the phone, so it's harder to get through there. In the past, I've done chargebacks when I can never reach a company, and that will be the inevitable conclusion here too.

Which shows how incredibly stupid Amazon is, when this household buys $4k of stuff a month from them, and just has edge-case returns sometimes. I'm sure they'll cancel my account first time, and, well, who cares.

When companies get to this level of "screw the consumer", they're at the edge of all ability to improve profits. There's no where left to go. I expect Amazon to have issues due to things like this, and the squeeze on foreign imports, and crash and burn on its side.

But back to your point? Yes, we should. Or, we should just pass laws which make centralized advertising, that is, the collection of Pii impossible.

Ban all Pii? Ban all transactions of Pii? And you end advertising as it is.

Re: LinkedIn is searching your browser extensions

#817

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> this is why I run ad blockers. It's pretty wild that we live in a world where the actual FBI has recommended we use ad blockers to protect ourselves, and if everyone actually listened, much of the Internet (and economy) as we know it would disappear. The FBI is like "you should protect yourself from the way that the third largest company in the world does business", and the average person's response is "nah, that w…

[flagged]

Please don't fulminate on HN. The guidelines make it clear we're trying for something better here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: LinkedIn is searching your browser extensions

#819
post #340

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But LinkedIn is the one social network many people literally cannot escape to put food on the table. I don't care about how much spying is going on in ESPN. I can ditch it at the shadow of a suspicion. Not so with LinkedIn. This is very alarming, and pretending it's not because everyone else does it sounds disingenuous to me.

You can also just browse LinkedIn with a browser that doesn’t have extensions installed, if privacy is that important to you. Like everyone else on this thread, I’m not condoning it or saying it’s a good thing, but this post is an exaggeration.

yeah yeah or we can do it from a contained virtual environment over VPN etc

it is a different angle of looking at this issue, and kind of shifts responsibility from their shitty practices over to us users

slippery slope approach, as we can see everywhere, this leads to more and more of such

I don't know I just started mocking everything and anything in there, its wall of shite and AI slop predominantly anyways, so why bother

Re: LinkedIn is searching your browser extensions

#820
post #777

You can guaranteed that this is a data protection and anti-scraping measure. I used to work with some recruiters and there are several third party recruiter tools that scrape linked in data to the third party sites database under the guise of supporting recruiters. I would rather this than having my LinkedIn data siphoned off other parts of the internet for god know what purpose.

So if the same exact action is done paying a fee to linkedin it is then ok?

LinkedIn is in a different category than your standard website or social site due to the amount of PII. I'm not saying it's right to scan your environment, but as someone with a LinkedIn account I would prefer they tried to protect my data than be lazy about it. You have more to worry about from Adobe's online tracking than LinkedIn checking your installed extension for scrapers.
Post reply on HN