Live data from Hacker News

Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs

axios.com

811–820 of 1001 posts

Re: Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs

#812

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hope not; "main" is shorter and more to the point, regardless of any DEI stuff.

I still rename my git remotes from origin to gh because less typing is nice.

Why not `g` then? Or `o`?

Re: Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs

#813

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Genuinely curious, which product’s quality has been sacrificed at the altar of DEI? Could you name some?

Just about every widely used software. Especially from Big Tech.

Care to provide any names, and some examples of how they were affected?

Re: Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs

#814

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s the goal of DEI; recognizing that scenarios like two hundred years of all male, all white SCOTUS judges and Presidents and all the other top slots was probably not due to them being inherently better than every non-white, non-male otherwise eligible person in the country.

How is that applicable to Europe? Who knows.

As somebody who born and spent significant portion of my life in very homogenous country.

Reading these threads I always come to the very same conclusion: diversity IS the problem and creates problems instead of providing any tangible benifits.

DEI is attempted solution to the "problem" and yet creates even more of a problem where people aren't hired based on merit and being the best candidate for the job.

None of those things are a problem in homogenous country. They simply do not exist.

Similarly it doesn't make sense that a person with a different skin color could bring anything new to the table, after all skin color does not matter.

Re: Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs

#815
post #198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is just common sense, or should be. Unfortunately common sense is as uncommon as people tend to joke about. So you get a lot of focus on business hiring practices, even though it's literally impossible to hire candidates that don't exist. Sometimes this gets taken to absolutely farcical levels. I recall reading a blog from an Irish writer about how activists were trying to demand that companies there hire black…

One of the smartest people I know almost quit software her first year out of school, because her all-male team spent an afternoon teasing her about how they were going to start a strip poker game and they think she'd be "a natural", or some nonsense like that. Do you think such dynamics introduce barriers to female participation in tech? Do you think focusing solely at the "bottom of the funnel" could still result in…

> Do you think such an event would've occurred without pushback on a team with more than 1 woman?

Sure. One of the women I dated detailed a story about how a man at a conference she attended suggested it'd be more fun if she was roofies. To her face, in front of her co-workers (many of them women). She was in a majority female industry (healthcare).

Why do we just assume that men stop doing cringe stuff just because women are around?

Re: Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs

#817

I wrote about my experience working as a software developer and being black in the industry and I was lucky to have it published on BBC [1]. What immediately followed, every large company reached out to have me work as a consultant for their diversity program. I found it fascinating that they had a team of DEI experts in place already. Like what makes one an expert? In addition to my job, I spent nights developing pr…

Wow.

I'm curious why it took hundreds of candidates to not be hired before it dawned on you that it was not sincere? Wouldn't the first dozen have been enough?

Unless your financial interests intersected with those of the companies you consulted for this "show"...?

But, I applaud your bravery in calling these guys out after they stopped giving you work.

Bravo.

Re: Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs

#818

I wrote about my experience working as a software developer and being black in the industry and I was lucky to have it published on BBC [1]. What immediately followed, every large company reached out to have me work as a consultant for their diversity program. I found it fascinating that they had a team of DEI experts in place already. Like what makes one an expert? In addition to my job, I spent nights developing pr…

Jeez, the most I ever got was called aside by the VP of Engineering on my last day to give him my opinion of their Diversity program ("since you're leaving, I figured you could be brutally honest with me"). Loved him for that, BTW :-) But seriously, congratulations! The negative effect of "fake diversity" is that it leaves everyone else wondering if the minority employees actually know what they're doing or if they w…

[deleted]

Re: Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs

#819

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Jeez, the most I ever got was called aside by the VP of Engineering on my last day to give him my opinion of their Diversity program ("since you're leaving, I figured you could be brutally honest with me"). Loved him for that, BTW :-) But seriously, congratulations! The negative effect of "fake diversity" is that it leaves everyone else wondering if the minority employees actually know what they're doing or if they w…

> The negative effect of "fake diversity" is that it leaves everyone else wondering if the minority employees actually know what they're doing or if they were hired to make the company look good. This is the most insidious thing, in my opinion. If you're already a hater, now you can unabashedly claim the moral high ground. "Did she interview well, or was she a diversity hire?"

One of my theories about DEI programs is: the people running the programs see their only failure mode as "we fail to improve our metric", but the much more dangerous failure mode is "current employees see our program as a joke that creates no value and hires unqualified people".

And it seems like a lot of DEI teams are just completely blind to the latter mode. You sometimes hear about a team announcing an apparently minor change, like renaming something to sound more inclusive, and then go on about how they spent six months discussing it and gathering feedback, and it's very obvious that nobody involved ever asked themselves "when we announce this are we going to sound like a serious team that does valuable work?"

Re: Meta's memo to employees rolling back DEI programs

#820

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is just common sense, or should be. Unfortunately common sense is as uncommon as people tend to joke about. So you get a lot of focus on business hiring practices, even though it's literally impossible to hire candidates that don't exist. Sometimes this gets taken to absolutely farcical levels. I recall reading a blog from an Irish writer about how activists were trying to demand that companies there hire black…

Except fields often aren’t open to people in different demographics. Sexism and racism are both very real and objectively quantified.

The problem is that when you quantify sexism in tech objectively, the results aren't what most people expect.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1418878112

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3672484

Post reply on HN