Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is much harder to explain to consumers why Apple should get a percentage-based rent (sorry Core Technology Fee that enables Privacy and Security™) if they go to a non-Apple website, download a non-Apple app, to do non-Apple-related things. Like literally the only participants in that business transaction are the consumer and the company, Apple does not even enter the picture. It would be like car manufacturers cha…
> Apple does not even enter the picture. Not exactly true, there are fragments of Apple intellectual property distributed with compiled binaries.
Which the annual tax (aka developer fee) presumably covers.