Live data from Hacker News

Trump wins presidency for second time

thehill.com

801–810 of 1001 posts

Re: Trump wins presidency for second time

#801

It's the economy, stupid: -Inflation is not prices; it is the rate of change in prices. Low inflation doesn't imply low prices. -Aggregate statistics don't necessarily explain individual outcomes. The Dems failed on this count massively, and have, for maybe the last 40 years, which is about the amount of time it took for my state to go from national bellwether (As goes Ohio, so goes the nation) to a reliably red stat…

Prices always go up. Sometimes faster, sometimes slower. We can slow it, but it's a fool's errand to make them go down. When I was a kid, I could get an ice cream cone for a 50 cents. That's never coming back.

Now that we've slowed inflation to a manageable level, we need to grow wages to catch up. I never heard a good plan on that from either side.

Re: Trump wins presidency for second time

#805

I think that Harris was a very poor choice of a candidate. I have no way to know this, but I like to imagine that a better Dem candidate would have led to a different president.

Who else could they have possibly picked on such a short notice? I think, it made sense at the time - now, of course, we can all Monday morning quarterback.

Re: Trump wins presidency for second time

#807
1) It's very hard for a woman to be elected president.

2) The electorate demographic without college degrees is more likely to make an emotional decision that is more easily manipulated with Trump-style bombast.

Not in a battleground state, I didn't see any advertising, but the Dems should have pounded Trump as a criminal sex offending lying hypocrit draft dodger loser felon bankrupt self-obsessed asshole (note this is not snark it's literally how they should have gone at him).

Re: Trump wins presidency for second time

#808

I think that Harris was a very poor choice of a candidate. I have no way to know this, but I like to imagine that a better Dem candidate would have led to a different president.

Between covid economic recovery and a war that dramatically and suddenly increased gas prices, I don't know what candidate would've done anything to turn the ship around. On election day, google search trends for "did biden drop out" had a massive spike. I think we consistently and considerably underestimate how tuned out the average voter is. Especially the independents that are the most likely to answer that they've made up their minds in the past 24 hours. It really does just come down to a vibe check for some of the most important swing voters

Re: Trump wins presidency for second time

#809

Reddit is finding out that if you block everyone not inside your echo chamber, but are still in the smaller echo chamber, every election will shock you It unfortunately sits on the shoulders of progressives seeking change to convince the conservatives not seeking it to do so. By choosing not to do this asymmetric work, this is the consequence

I'm not a Reddit user (or any social media user unless you count this) but one of my big takeaways from this election is how out-of-touch I am, apparently, with the majority of Americans; I've been shocked for months (years?) that Trump was even still a contender.

I guess I've just been living in heavily blue places, and working alongside highly educated people, since 2016. I thought that everybody could see Trump and Trumpism for what they really are, but I guess not, and I'm left wondering: "Who are these 70M+ people?"

Re: Trump wins presidency for second time

#810

Reading through the post is quite depressing. As a lifelong independent, I've never felt more vilified by the Democratic Party than at any other time. Constantly being talked down to, insulted as a white supremacist, nazi, etc. It's this "elitist" and "we know better than you" attitude that really, really puts a sour taste in my mouth. Yet, reading through these comments, it seems alive and well even after an astound…

i think this is the insidious thing about polarization:

people in the middle get caught in the crossfire of harsh rhetoric. and it is hard to blame people for this, an eye for an eye is so easy and tempting.

I've had right wingers criticize me with patronizing "anti-commie" rhetoric, but the worst has been shaming (yes actual shaming and exclusion) from my peers because i (mostly) agree with them in a contrarian way that they dont like or attempt to understand.

i don't really interact with many right wingers day to day, so this difference might just be a result of that bias.

I'm curious if this kind of thing happens to right wingers as well, or if there is less such "friendly-fire" on the right.

P.S I'm European.

Post reply on HN