81–90 of 149 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> > > There's a time and place for SPAs, you can't just dismiss it entirely. Every web app today should be an SPA. I feel like this is a joke or amusingly unintentional.
Honest question, what's wrong with SPA?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps you want this 1988 quote from Edsger W. Dijkstra: My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger.
I think the idea of reducing lines of code as a means of success can go too far. Sure, you can squeeze that block of code down a few dozens of lines of code, but then how hard is it to follow along behind you and deduce your intentions? You may be saving something today to just be needlessly spending it tomorrow.
Good article, I agree with a lot of this, but I can't help myself from commenting. >>> When given the choice to add a preprocessor (e.g. LESS, SASS, CoffeeScript etc) to the technology stack, the BFED realises there is a deeper impact beyond just "writing less code". Will it be harder to onboard developers? Will debugging code be more difficult? If the answer to any of these questions is yes then the BFED will say no…
Of course there's documenting right? Except you document and do this fantastic job training but when it's all set and done, technology has moved on when the project wraps and there's already something better that can't coexist with the method you used.
Preprocessors also have disadvantages, not just training. Every time you abstract something, then abstract it again you are risking that what comes out could be problematic and harder to fix.
think about this. in the end, the browser is displaying based on the final CSS. You inspect the final css. If you're trying to fix something, you have to discover it, then work backwards to it's source. Inspect tools show you what's there and what you have to edit. But it takes yet another set of steps and complexity to work backwards to your css before it was processed.
make sense? So tech moves on and new complexity and longer problem solving procedures are introduced. Yay. No wonder there's an attraction to being boring.
To rework a quote from bruce lee for this. The guy who practices one kick a thousand times is much more formidable than the guy who practices a thousand different kicks one time.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a great quote! (the last line) That's something I've experienced but hadn't really been aware of until I read that.
Perhaps you want this 1988 quote from Edsger W. Dijkstra: My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger.
My version is snappier, though! Maybe my liberal arts degree wasn't such a waste after all :-D
Earlier quoted context omitted.
"This is the technology industry, we don't have time for new technology!"
The industry that still argues about which text editor from the 1970s is the best tool to code in has a problem with rapid paradigm shifts? I'm shocked.
I use emacs and avoid IDEs.
That said, I have no interest in the emacs vs. vi debate. I don't care what tools you use, as long as you don't do things in a way that force me to use specific tools (e.g. enterprise environments that becomes IDE-dependent).
As for me, I don't like mindless churn. This industry desperately needs to improve. It's running at about 5% (if that) of its real potential. But the constant fire drilling that comes with moving from one well-sold crappy technology to another well-sold crappy technology is really irritating, and it's part of why so many good programmers tend to move up into management.
This article is terrible. It argues for awful web and UI development, and seems to be doing it entirely out of some kind of perverse pride. The first item in this list recommends support for IE6 or below, a decision which will massively balloon your project budget for a shot at roughly %1 of the total browser market. Microsoft itself has launched multiple campaigns to get developers to stop supporting IE6. Charitably…
Good article, I agree with a lot of this, but I can't help myself from commenting. >>> When given the choice to add a preprocessor (e.g. LESS, SASS, CoffeeScript etc) to the technology stack, the BFED realises there is a deeper impact beyond just "writing less code". Will it be harder to onboard developers? Will debugging code be more difficult? If the answer to any of these questions is yes then the BFED will say no…
Controversial opinion, but I myself use CSS preprocessors quite sparingly. I actually see nothing wrong with the CSS syntax. I like the fact that CSS is (almost) nothing but a bunch of named key-value pairs. The real issues have always been semantic, in the subtleties of the box model, which Flexbox is addressing somewhat, though more daring ideas like constraint-based styling are still niche. Just look at the LESS e…
First things first: This article presents a lovely sentiment — although any argument against CSS preprocessors is a losing one — and is a timely reminder to focus on the things that matter. However… When was this published? There’s no date anywhere on the page or even in its source code, but he mentions supporting "IE6 and below". This is actually no longer possible if “HTTPS” is a requirement, as the best version of…
Blah. Yet another "new-fangled technologies have no place" post. Granted, there's a grain of truth to the core thought. As I've become more experienced, I've seen more frameworks and libraries that re-invent the wheel and solve problems that have already been solved long ago, albeit in a trendier manner. But at the end of the day, software engineers are technologists. Our job is to create and consume technology. Bein…
The boring front-end developer doesn't get paid very much.