Firefox 39.0 released

To those using FF, is there a way to get an "omnibar" similar to Safari?

For example, Safari usually suggests Wikipedia articles or other useful autocompletions. FF only autocompletes from domain names, bookmarks and history, it seems. It does have a separate search input in the toolbar, but even that one doesn't do what Safari does; all the suggested autocompletes are from Google, and additional search engines like Wikipedia or Amazon require that you click on their icon to search.

There's an extension called Omnibar, but it doesn't seem to provide suggestions from other than Google, bookmarks and history.

> correspond to a widely-used system (Fitzpatrick)

The fact that a system is widely used when classifying the impact of UV light on melanoma does not imply that it has relevance in another.

> 6 choices is far better than none.

Actually, no, sometimes the "solution" is worse than the problem. It's quite regressive to bake an outdated conception of the color theory of race into a standard that aims to "educate and engage academic and scientific communities, and the general public" (the stated mission of the Unicode Consortium).

As one of the "billions of people who aren't white" that you refer to in your original comment, I find this approach more problematic than the existing status quo (leaving it up to the font creators).

After the CVE score for BEAST and RC4 got adjusted and the RFC 7465 was introduced I've seen some payment systems update their system quite quickly (in a matter of days), and if they didn't they'd probably fail their next PCI audit: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9198889

Perhaps it helps if you write your payment site operator/bank private emails asking them to allow other ciphers beside RC4, mine looked like this (actual site name removed):

  According to Qualys SSL Labs the site **** [2] only supports the RC4 cipher, 
  and thus is not RFC 7465 compliant [3], and Google Chrome qualifies the site as 
  "Your connection to **** is encrypted with obsolete cryptography."

  The site **** is even worse [4], it uses only 768-bit DH key exchange in some 
  situations (instead of 2048).

  There is an online tool [5] that you can use to generate/compare 
  configuration for popular web-servers, using the intermediate level is 
  recommended [6].

  For your information I sent a similar email last year to **** and they have 
  fixed their problems, and get a nice 'A' grade from SSLLabs now.

  Apparently this use of RC4 all comes down due to a mistake in NIST's 
  classification of the severity of the BEAST vulnerability [7], but both Google 
  Chrome[7] and Mozilla Firefox[8] are trying to avoid the use of RC4 completely, 
  and mitigating the BEAST vulnerability is no excuse for not providing good 
  ciphers (in addition to RC4 if you must) when my browser supports TLS 1.2 with 
  AES-GCM which is NOT vulnerable to the BEAST attack.

  I suggest you to include the Qualys SSL Labs test when testing sites for 
  PCI-DSS compliance, they are usually quite good at reporting the latest TLS 
  vulnerabilities for a server.

  [1] http://www.visaeurope.com/media/images/pci%20dss%20validated%20web%20listing%20march%202015-73-18412.pdf
  [2] https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=****
 This server accepts the RC4 cipher, which is weak. Grade capped to B.
 Certificate uses a weak signature. When renewing, ensure you upgrade to SHA2.
  [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7465
  [4] https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=****
 This server supports insecure Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange parameters. Grade set to F.
 Certificate uses a weak signature. When renewing, ensure you upgrade to SHA2.
 The server supports only older protocols, but not the current best TLS 1.2. Grade capped to B.
 This server accepts the RC4 cipher, which is weak. Grade capped to B.
  [5] https://mozilla.github.io/server-side-tls/ssl-config-generator/
  [6] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS
  [7] https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=375342#c30
  [8] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1088915
  [9] https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=****

There are some Firefox add-ons that let you run multiple profiles in separate windows.

this is in Safari 9 as well. https://developer.apple.com/library/prerelease/mac/releaseno...