If you'd bought $10,000 of AAPL stock when this article was published (June 1997), it would be worth about $523,000 today, excluding dividends.
Hindsight is 20/20. At that point in time buying Apple stok was akin to throwing your money away in the forseeable future. I just really wish I bought 10 bitcoins when they were 40 a pop .. Damn you, captain Hindsight!
Ways to save Apple (1997)
81–82 of 82 posts
Re: Ways to save Apple (1997)
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is not about Android or iPhone. Or Google or whoever. I'll happily acknowledge that Apple sells well thought out products. I stand by what I said earlier. There's too much of a cult of personality associated with Apple. Why do we shrink our worldview to gossipy discussions of a corporation. Tell me something interesting, something edifying that came up in this discussion?
> This is not about Android or iPhone. Or Google or whoever. I'll happily acknowledge that Apple sells well thought out products. You specifically said that I was wrong to call them influential. I think Android demonstrates that they are. That makes it relevant. > I stand by what I said earlier. There's too much of a cult of personality associated with Apple. Why do we shrink our worldview to gossipy discussions of a…
However, my larger point is that Apple produces things of only one color -- things that you can exchange over the counter against money. Black box objects that are essentially consumer electronics -- things that die in 2, 4, 7, whatever years.
Contrast that with most other tech companies. Even if I don't care a whit about what they sell (witness IBM, Microsoft, Facebook -- I don't use any of their products directly) -- I (and the world) profit from their research and that gives them greater longevity than Apple.
So to correct what I said -- admired but not long term influential.