I feel like this is one of the things that caused Wave to die -- it was only something useful if many people are using it, and they didn't let many people use it.
Google Contributor
81–90 of 201 posts
Re: Google Contributor
#82A fraction of $3/mo? From a company that abandons projects left and right? I'll stick to Patreon, thanks. I'm making about $800 on a productive month now despite there being a pretty small audience for comics about a lesbian robot with PKD problems. I set "no ads for anyone" as my goal for like $50/p, which was still making far more than I ever did from ad impressions. Most people only contribute a buck or so a page…
Re: Google Contributor
#83A fraction of $3/mo? From a company that abandons projects left and right? I'll stick to Patreon, thanks. I'm making about $800 on a productive month now despite there being a pretty small audience for comics about a lesbian robot with PKD problems. I set "no ads for anyone" as my goal for like $50/p, which was still making far more than I ever did from ad impressions. Most people only contribute a buck or so a page…
This seems targeted at larger, semi-faceless websites which may only be able to survive with tiny contributions from a mass audience. Imgur is probably the best example of that; it's infrastructure that people appreciate, but few want to pay for.
Re: Google Contributor
#84Re: Google Contributor
#85I'll get back to ya'll with the results of the experiment.
Re: Google Contributor
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
The same problem exists with ads, though. By browsing a site with ads, you're supporting them.
Only in a very, very small and indirect way. And you can solve that problem by installing and ad blocker and whitelisting sites.
I suppose that if you're running an appropriately-designed ad blocker (i.e., one that prevents Google's third-party ad cookies from reaching the site), then Google won't be able to route your contribution to the site, anyway.
Re: Google Contributor
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
The same problem exists with ads, though. By browsing a site with ads, you're supporting them.
Only in a very, very small and indirect way. And you can solve that problem by installing and ad blocker and whitelisting sites.
I wonder how hard it would be to block the script/call on sites you don't want to support (or just whitelist it on ones you do). I'd imagine not very.
Re: Google Contributor
#88Should Google be collecting this revenue for the content providers? Or could the individual content providers not collect this revenue themselves without having Google take a cut. How hard is it for a site to setup a simple paywall linked to a low-cost payment processor? Why work with the record label when you could be producing your own work and keep 100% of the profit?
Re: Google Contributor
#89I think I'll setup some "pixel patterns where you would normally see an ad" on my own site and maybe people will start donating bitcoins to my site. I'll get back to ya'll with the results of the experiment.
Re: Google Contributor
#90A fraction of $3/mo? From a company that abandons projects left and right? I'll stick to Patreon, thanks. I'm making about $800 on a productive month now despite there being a pretty small audience for comics about a lesbian robot with PKD problems. I set "no ads for anyone" as my goal for like $50/p, which was still making far more than I ever did from ad impressions. Most people only contribute a buck or so a page…