Comments #5, #13, #23, #25, #30 and #31 between Mr. Pratt and Cory Doctorow are the relevant bits. I'm sure there is lesson here about mega-blog PR.
Fundable comes to an ugly end
81–86 of 86 posts
Re: Fundable comes to an ugly end
#82This is exactly why I will never go into business with a non-technical person. This site is exactly what I think of when I think "business person".
That's a piss-poor attitude.
When I commented, the link was to a rant about how the programmer screwed over the business with bad code.
Re: Fundable comes to an ugly end
#83Re: Fundable comes to an ugly end
#84Re: Fundable comes to an ugly end
#85In spite of all the issues this case raises, only one popped out at me... Team of 2: 1 programmer + 1 non-programmer = bad combination. Maybe I'm a little old fashioned, but in a 2 person web startup, both should be programmers. I'm certainly not suggesting that this is what caused this situation, but it sure didn't help... Since only one programmed, the probability of future difficulties increased dramatically, and…
A lot of successful partnerships had clear division of responsibility - often an "inside man" and an "outside man".
The inside man handles the employees, bookkeeping and systems. The outside man handles sales.
When two cooks are responsible for the same pot, there's trouble. And unwatched pots.
There are many variations on the good pattern - take McDonald's. Ray Kroc handled the franchisees and systems, while CEO Harry Sonneborn handled the money, real estata and investors.