Live data from Hacker News

Linda Sandvik Resigns As Director Of Code Club

gist.github.com

81–85 of 85 posts

Re: Linda Sandvik Resigns As Director Of Code Club

#82
post #38

If I had a sponsor and an employee was criticizing the decision to say something to that employee would be based on how the criticism was done. If the person mentioned that they just didn't like Google's surveillance program then I would let it go. But if they ran around yelling about Google is evil because of said programs then we would have to have a talk. If I am running a small company and your personal opinions…

Code Club is a not-for-profit organisation, and Linda was a founder. It may cost them money, but don't the aims of the organisation come into it?

Just because they are not-for-profit doesn't mean that they don't need money to keep running their business. It also doesn't mean that nobody get's paid.

Re: Linda Sandvik Resigns As Director Of Code Club

#83
post #76
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know and deeply respect people on both sides of that controversy and also believe that the tide of equality for LGBT people is one of the great civil liberties success stories of the last 25 years. Without inadvertently casting aspersions on anyone who holds the opposing opinion, I think running someone out of a company because they hold a political opinion incompatible with your ethics is itself an unethical act.…

That's probably a misstatement of your opinion: you almost certainly draw the line somewhere (or at least I would be quite surprised if you didn't), eg white power advocates, racism against blacks or jews, anti-women's equality, anti-disabled rights; but don't include gay rights as equally important.

I wrote an answer explaining how this attempt to summarize my beliefs was inaccurate but then decided that it was inappropriate to allow the thread to become a tangent about how I do or do not fully support gay rights. I stand by my previous answer.

Re: Linda Sandvik Resigns As Director Of Code Club

#84
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Here, take all this money and be quiet about everything we do". That's not how a healthy society works. Google are sponsoring Code Club not because they're good guys, but because they have some business interest in it. They must be accountable for their actions, good or bad. Linda Sandvik expressed her believes as a person and she did great not accepting being silenced just because she was hurting the feelings of a…

"because they have some business interest in it." The business interest might be conveying a positive image of Google. So using the code club as a vehicle to paint a bad image of Google would be detrimental to the business interest. Why then should they pour more money into it?

AFAIK, you can express your believes as a person and don't need an endorse of your volunteer group.

Re: Linda Sandvik Resigns As Director Of Code Club

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You should be always able to criticise companies/organisations you depend on. Otherwise, why would they improve anything for you? Taking an example on a bigger scale: you should be able to openly criticise some actions of the government, even if you're receiving benefits.

Are you employed? Could you tell us some things you really dislike about your company? (Giving your real name and your employers real name) Rolling with the government example: should the government be obliged to fund communists (or other people who think the current government is evil)?

Yes I am. No, I couldn't. That's exactly what I think is not right and should change.
Post reply on HN