Live data from Hacker News

Skype group video calling becomes free

blogs.skype.com

81–90 of 169 posts

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#81
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For some reason, G+ hangouts eat a lot more CPU for me than Skype does.

Lack of GPU acceleration of Flash?

I'm more inclined to think lack of HW-decoding for VP8/9 + Google's "VideoandTalk" plugin on OSX is a piece of crap.

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#83
post #33
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not just point them at http://g.co/hangouts ?

Where did you find that link? Or indeed, the page it points to? I've never seen either before.

https://twitter.com/GoogleAtWork/status/439491072608055296

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#84
post #64

Another neat fact - announced in a Youtube video! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4C1DGzHiis&list=PLaLRbjVhH6...

Strange, on their website, they "recommend" group talking with 5 people. On above YouTube video, they said, you "can" talk with 10 people.

I imagine 5 is the upper bounds in their testing for users on the low/mid-level speed tiers from ISPs (ie. what most consumers buy) for "acceptable" video quality.

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#85
It used to be free a few years ago too until it became 'premium' in early 2011. [1] Difference is that now Skype features more ads than in 2011, even if you have multiple monthly subscriptions (A no-ad version is now a considerable perk of the premium version).

[1] - http://www.macworld.com/article/1157435/skype5.html

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#86
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Skype is a service, not just a desktop client. It's like asking what the best open source alternative to Google search or Google maps might be.

Can you point me to Skype's API? I always thought that Skype was a closed protocol and that they don't want any other client applications using their service...

Messenger probably didn't want any other clients using their service, but that didn't stop the Pidgins and Trillians of the world... :)

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#89
post #43

Finally! I don't know anyone who likes G+ over Skype, but we all use it for the group video features.

I prefer Skype since although it has always been a huge CPU hog, its UI is perfect for beginners (i.e. family) and in the decade I've used it, I've never once been cross-sold some pointless feature the parent company are currently trying to promote. Note Hangouts itself once was Gtalk, which I was a user of, prior to the first cattle herding on to Google+. Now Gundotra is out the door, there is no telling into which…

As a user of several Google products, the "cattle-herded" metaphor is perfect. Not a week goes by without my needing to counsel a former Picasa users nursing wounds from the great G+ herding of 2013.

Re: Skype group video calling becomes free

#90
post #57
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm the CEO of a small remote-working startup with 5 employees. I pay $20/mo for Skype since some of people I meet with only use that and I need the group screen sharing feature. Whenever I have a Skype meeting, I'm nervous, because 50% of the time video or screen sharing won't work. Once I get them to switch to Hangouts there's no problems, ever. Are you telling me that you experience the opposite? If so, that's ver…

We've been using hangouts more or less exclusively for at least a year. Hangouts are very stable. When doing training we have hangout sessions that last for two days (minus the nights of course). The problem with hangouts are with access control. Most people are not signed in with an ID that matches their email address and I still don't know how to schedule a hangout that is protected only by it's URL.

I've been able to create URL-based "unlisted" hangouts with:

http://plus.google.com/hangouts/_

That will redirect you to a new hangout URL, and (in my experience) you can just copy/paste the new URL to other folks. To use it, they'll need to be logged into a G+ account, but it doesn't matter which one.

Post reply on HN