Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bitcoin is not a ponzi scheme. It's a technology with actual useful properties. The code is out there to see. If you don't understand why these properties are useful to so many people, I welcome you to the third world countries where you can't start selling your product to the rest of the world (even if it's a great one), because PayPal doesn't work with your country and cc processors won't let you accept cards from…
It can't be both? The declining rate of bitcoin generation certainly has ponzi-like properties. It seems like the primary motivation to mine is assuming that the value will go up as mining becomes more difficult.
Bitcoin heading towards $200, new bubble forming
81–90 of 114 posts
Re: Bitcoin heading towards $200, new bubble forming
#82$200? Hardly. Maybe if you look at Mt.Gox, it might look like you could get $190 per bitcoin. Howerver, there is no way to actually get that money to your bank account, since Mt. Gox hasn't been doing any banktransfers for months. The price is high on Mt.Gox because people that have money on there can only get it out by buying Bitcoins and transfering those to other exchanges. This drives the Mt.Gox price up. If you…
Re: Bitcoin heading towards $200, new bubble forming
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bitcoin is not a ponzi scheme. It's a technology with actual useful properties. The code is out there to see. If you don't understand why these properties are useful to so many people, I welcome you to the third world countries where you can't start selling your product to the rest of the world (even if it's a great one), because PayPal doesn't work with your country and cc processors won't let you accept cards from…
It can't be both? The declining rate of bitcoin generation certainly has ponzi-like properties. It seems like the primary motivation to mine is assuming that the value will go up as mining becomes more difficult.
Re: Bitcoin heading towards $200, new bubble forming
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
Its inherently deflationary anyway (which is a terrible idea for a currency).
It's extremely implausible for everyone to know that the value of ${commodity} will rise steadily, with no risk, for the foreseeable future. Why? Think of the second-order effects of what you're saying--I expect the value of ${commodity} to rise indefinitely, so what do I do? Buy ${commodity}. Or, I own a bunch of ${commodity} and expect the price to rise indefinitely--what do I do if someone offers to buy my ${commo…
Re: Bitcoin heading towards $200, new bubble forming
#85Re: Bitcoin heading towards $200, new bubble forming
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
It can't be both? The declining rate of bitcoin generation certainly has ponzi-like properties. It seems like the primary motivation to mine is assuming that the value will go up as mining becomes more difficult.
So? Is Gold a ponzi scheme too? I don't see a problem with the declining rate of generation because you can divide Bitcoin up to some pretty small fractions. You have to really wrap your head around deflation, you know. It's a beautiful and healthy thing, it's just that we've been told it's not.
If you're always incentivized to hold something and never incentivized to spend it, it becomes more of an asset than a currency. Gold is an asset, too, but it has much broader market participation in addition to being "special" as a value store due to 6,000 years of tradition.
If you've got an asset with a lot of hype that's supposed to always increase in value, so you better get on board now unless you want to be a sucker, that looks a lot like a ponzi scheme to me. You can still make money on it, don't let me stop you. You're probably not going to refactor capitalism with it.
Additionally, (I'm assuming you're a little young and naive here, apologies if that's not the case), additionally I'd really suggest decoupling your personal political beliefs from investment decisions with real money. It never ends well.
Re: Bitcoin heading towards $200, new bubble forming
#87http://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/btce/btcusd
(They both show the same trend, I'm just being pedantic)
Re: Bitcoin heading towards $200, new bubble forming
#88How many legitimate real world services and products currently accept Bitcoins? I understand it is only the Chinese search engine. I also take it for granted that any major Euro/US-based organization (be it Google or Domino's Pizza) that starts accepting Bitcoins will instantly face very serious political repercussions. Given these facts it is astonishing that Bitcoin seems to be heading from strength to strength.
The hundreds (thousands now?) of (mostly) small businesses accepting bitcoin for goods and services include gift card vendors. [1]
You can spend your bitcoins on gift cards (a form of virtual currency in itself) which you can use at some of the world's largest retailers, for example Amazon[2] or Walmart [3].
It's a two-step process, but you can use your bitcoins at Amazon or Walmart, today.
[1] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Trade#Gift.2FDebit_Cards
[2] http://www.gyft.com/shop-for-gift-cards/
[3] http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1om2jm/egifter_now_...
Re: Bitcoin heading towards $200, new bubble forming
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
So? Is Gold a ponzi scheme too? I don't see a problem with the declining rate of generation because you can divide Bitcoin up to some pretty small fractions. You have to really wrap your head around deflation, you know. It's a beautiful and healthy thing, it's just that we've been told it's not.
So you're saying it has ponzi-ish properties? Or not? If you're always incentivized to hold something and never incentivized to spend it, it becomes more of an asset than a currency. Gold is an asset, too, but it has much broader market participation in addition to being "special" as a value store due to 6,000 years of tradition. If you've got an asset with a lot of hype that's supposed to always increase in value, s…
But let's come back to that notion of yours
> If you're always incentivized to hold something and never incentivized to spend it, it becomes more of an asset than a currency."
Let's say all you got is 10btc and $0 in your bank account. And you need some food. You're probably gonna decide not to starve yourself to death because being alive tomorrow is more valuable to you than having more money and being dead. Thus you are going to spend your bitcoins (either directly or by exchanging them into fiat).
Now, what you probably wouldn't do is buy something you don't really need or want at the moment. And that's fine, in this case Bitcoin encourages responsible spending. Now, of course, you should understand why a deflationary currency grows long term - not speculation, but new products and services in the economy. If no one spends, then no new products and services appear, currency is not gaining in value. If it's not gaining in value anymore you have your incentives to spend back.
The major differences with a deflationary currency are this: 1. No one forces you to spend (like governments inflating your money), so you make decisions on your own. 2. Deflation is an ultimate tax that rich cannot avoid. If you make money, you will inevitably share it with the rest (their money gaining in value).
Re: Bitcoin heading towards $200, new bubble forming
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you're saying it has ponzi-ish properties? Or not? If you're always incentivized to hold something and never incentivized to spend it, it becomes more of an asset than a currency. Gold is an asset, too, but it has much broader market participation in addition to being "special" as a value store due to 6,000 years of tradition. If you've got an asset with a lot of hype that's supposed to always increase in value, s…
No, I don't believe Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme at all. And I really don't think my age is relevant, you either have arguments or you don't. But let's come back to that notion of yours > If you're always incentivized to hold something and never incentivized to spend it, it becomes more of an asset than a currency." Let's say all you got is 10btc and $0 in your bank account. And you need some food. You're probably gonna…
Everyone thinks they have a simple way to fix everything when they're 22. By the time you're 30-40 it's amazing how much smarter the rest of the world got. You can take my word for it as regards politics and investment, or not, it's your money.
On the argument, you're implicitly admitting that you wouldn't spend bitcoins until you were completely out of dollars, because bitcoins will 'always appreciate'. That's kinda conceding my point as far as asset vs currency. You can sell stock for dollars if you're short on cash as well.
It seems that we agree on the effects of deflationary currency incentivizing not spending money. There's a few examples of that phenomenon happening in the real world, and none of them were really great for GDP growth (severe understatement). You know that spending by a lot of people is what adds up to that 14T GDP number, right?