Live data from Hacker News

The One-Person Product

marco.org

81–90 of 107 posts

Re: The One-Person Product

#81

Curious: What does the day-and-night-iPhone reference mean? [Edit: Genuine thanks for the explanation everyone, but boy am I sorry I asked.]

http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/my-phone/2013/03/dave-mori...

That interview can't be real. Surely he was satirically making light the whole bro-grammer meme? Right? Hard for me to believe you can condense so much "douchiness" without it being in jest and intentional.

Re: The One-Person Product

#82
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that's actually the point of the piece: David is so focused on product that he doesn't want to deal with things like operations or revenue that the deal makes sense. Yahoo will take care of those things, and David can focus on the only thing he cares about, product.

This seems disingenuous to me. A key part of creating a great "product" is that it continues to support itself. Having a great product without having some sort of a revenue stream isn't being hyper-focused - it's being negligent. Congrats to David on everything, but it seems very odd to try & separate "product" from the revenue that it should generate if it's going to be a business.

Not so much to me. There are legions of artists creating non-software works/products/pieces/whatever that have to worry about non-existent revenue stream (or don't worry about it at all). Greatness in their craft is not really linked to the money at all. Some people may link the two with software, but there's really no innate reason to do so (see many OSS projects). Exterior costs such as servers, software, hardware etc create the impression of a link, but innately, I don't think there is one.

Let me rephrase your sentence that makes more sense to me: A key part of creating a great "business" is that it continues to support itself.

Re: The One-Person Product

#83
post #19

The post says he won't make "yacht-and-helicopter money"... I think helicopters are cheaper than he thinks. On a billion-dollar acquisition, I can't imagine the near-cofounder having less than 1% (hopefully quite a bit more). This means at least $10M, which should be plenty for a helicopter. Maybe I'm reading his comment too literally.

For a helicopter, you need a hangar, a pilot, regular maintenance, insurance, fuel/oil as well as membership/pad fees if you actually want to fly anywhere besides airports. You could do a small helicopter for $200,000-$400,000 and then about $30,000-$40,000 a year in recurring costs before pilot, fuel and oil. You can expect $300-$400 per hour of flight time. If the 10 million is invested and has a return of 4% annua…

"if it flies, floats or fornicates, in the long run its cheaper to rent it"

Re: The One-Person Product

#84
post #72
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That actually makes me more wary of reddit than tumblr. For others, the llinked-to reddit seems to be mostly about laughing at and sometimes harassing people on tumblr that have pride in alternative lifestyles or viewpoints.

Yes this seems like one of the anti-feminist 'men's rights activists' type subreddits.

Why do you have men's rights activists in quotes?

Re: The One-Person Product

#86
post #84
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes this seems like one of the anti-feminist 'men's rights activists' type subreddits.

Why do you have men's rights activists in quotes?

er, bracketing that I forgot to finish. I originally meant to write: anti-feminist/'men's rights activist'

Re: The One-Person Product

#88
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For a helicopter, you need a hangar, a pilot, regular maintenance, insurance, fuel/oil as well as membership/pad fees if you actually want to fly anywhere besides airports. You could do a small helicopter for $200,000-$400,000 and then about $30,000-$40,000 a year in recurring costs before pilot, fuel and oil. You can expect $300-$400 per hour of flight time. If the 10 million is invested and has a return of 4% annua…

"if it flies, floats or fornicates, in the long run its cheaper to rent it"

... but if it does all three, put a ring on it!

Re: The One-Person Product

#90
post #10

I know very little about David Karp. But after reading this, I'm a bit surprised that he decided to sell Tumblr. The way Marco talks about David's disinterest in money, and his singular obsession with Tumblr, made me think he wouldn't even consider selling it to someone else. I'd be curious to hear his reasons for selling, as oppose to doing a strategic investment like Facebook did with Microsoft at one point.

I guess everyone gets bored of their passion after a while.
Post reply on HN