Live data from Hacker News

New GitHub Logo

github.com

81–90 of 110 posts

Re: New GitHub Logo

#81
post #9

Given the old icon was just a lowercase g in various containers, I think this is a good step. The octocat is already recognizable, and although it's a little too detailed for small rendering, it's still relatively unique and distinct. Nice work on this one. It may not be the perfect symbol, but it is uniquely and definitively github.

How old are we talking about? As far as I know, their logo has been the same, only inverted [0], for the last year or so.

[0] https://raw.github.com/travis-ci/travis-assets/6ce43a0eee505...

Re: New GitHub Logo

#82
post #55

I'm a little surprised by the striking similarities between Octocat and the "Octonauts" (www.octonauts.com) - a cartoon in the UK that my two kids are mad about. I'm trusting that these copyright/design right concerns have been contemplated at least - not least because of the similarity in name as well as in design. (See the google images link for a collection of octonauts: http://goo.gl/Xek21 )

Not really that similar, big heads and round ears. The artist who drew the octocat has plenty of other characters in the same style: http://www.idokungfoo.com/

All very wise observations, folks. I feel better now. And thanks.

Re: New GitHub Logo

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's Apex Sans: http://vllg.com/Constellation/Apex_Sans

So it is! I see that it was tweaked quite heavily; rounded corners on all the glyphs, altered ‘G’, ‘i’, and ‘t’, different weight, etc. Comparison: http://imgur.com/ggI204m Were you involved in the design process? How was Apex selected? It’s not a particularly well-known font and it’s for sale at very few places.

Nah, I'm just repeating what @bryanveloso said: https://twitter.com/bryanveloso/status/324204710888357888 and https://twitter.com/bryanveloso/status/324214383989383168.

Re: New GitHub Logo

#84
post #64

It probably feels to them like GitHub is so well known that the company needs to be called that. I think they're actually early enough on that they could just make it one of their products. SocialCoding, Inc. / | \ GitHub ??? ???

They actually went down the opposite path, changing their company name from Logical Awesome to GitHub See https://github.com/blog/589-new-year-new-company

Well, it's pretty common to have a generic name for your corporation. No one but their lawyers ever really knew about that name. I'm saying that I think they could actually build a corporate brand separate from GitHub.

Re: New GitHub Logo

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looks pretty twitter bootstrap like, if you ask me. I feel that a lot of designs are ending up like this due to bootstrap influence, which, might be influenced by dropbox for all I know.

I wrote all the styles for Bootstrap and refactored GitHub's forms and buttons a few months ago for a similar approach. Not 100% the same, but definitely close. All those styles are tested thoroughly within Bootstrap and made it super easy to update and standardize our styles, while at the same time dropping mad duplicate code. The overall homepage though I think looks nothing like Bootstrap's docs, if that's what yo…

I wasn't implying that it looks like Bootstrap's docs, I was saying that it looks influenced by the conventions Bootstrap conforms to, which, makes sense from your first paragraph.

Either way, I don't think it matters. It looks good and clean.

Re: New GitHub Logo

#86
post #5

It seems that GitHub wants a more "serious" look. I wonder why that is. Do managers dismiss GitHub for Enterprise as a possibility because it feels hackish/unprofessional?

I think it's not that they want to be more "serious" but more they didn't want the logotype to look like the first idea a college kid had.

The type was so terrible on it.

Re: New GitHub Logo

#87
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you download the mark, it's a .zip including some smaller versions without suckers on the tentacle.

Exactly. Compare the logo in the blog post to the one in the masthead. And then go one step further and compare to the favicon (no tail there). The small sizes don't have to convey that the tail is a tentacle, they just have to convey "GitHub".

There is a tail in the new favicon[0] It's also been the old logo[1]

[0] https://github.com/favicon.ico

[1] http://octodex.github.com/favicon.ico

Re: New GitHub Logo

#88
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or Tentaclecat

It’s hard to tell whether this creature has arms or tentacles, or both. Octopuses have both. Also, 7-arm octopuses are still called ‘octopuses’. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cephalopod_arm

According to Zach Holman, it's four legs and a tail: https://speakerdeck.com/holman/git-and-github-secrets?slide=...

Re: New GitHub Logo

#89
post #77

What's the story behind Octocat? That...thing...doesn't really do much for me as far as a corporate logo goes. Rather complex shape (see references to scaling problems), sorta catish but not, WTH is that weird tail (cat, four legs and a...), this post is the first reference to "octo" I've seen in the months I've used the service, there's 5 limbs not 8, etc. Makes me think of a little kid in a Halloween costume. "Gith…

Git isn't a spoof of get, Linus named it because he's a git. Or at least that's what he said once.

From the official Git README:

    "git" can mean anything, depending on your mood.

     - random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not
       actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a
       mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
     - stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the
       dictionary of slang.
     - "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually
       works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
     - "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/README

Re: New GitHub Logo

#90
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Git isn't a spoof of get, Linus named it because he's a git. Or at least that's what he said once.

From the official Git README: "git" can mean anything, depending on your mood. - random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant. - stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang. - "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actu…

Wonderful.

And that's why git's awesome.

Post reply on HN