Earlier quoted context omitted.
How is Now strategic?
The more Google [Now] knows about you, the better it can target you with ads.
Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
81–90 of 242 posts
Re: Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
#82Reason I ask: Google scrapped Notebook (http://www.google.com/googlenotebook/faq.html) a while back, and has now released Google Keep. To me, this is a tear down and rebranding. I can't speak to the reason of it, but I would guess Google Keep already has more users than Notebook did. I can't speak for Google, but I certainly know their goal is not to lose 500k users to Feedly. My guess being, they likely want to take the smoothest, but also cheapest, way out of a product that they can no longer maintain.
Re: Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
#83Re: Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
#84Re: Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You realise there were feed services that went kaput because of Reader People keep saying something like this without providing real examples. I can believe Reader's existence might have depressed the market for new feed readers (though there have long been competitors around--lots of open source and built in ones, and a few for-pay ones too, like Feedly), but I haven't been able to personally think of any feed rea…
>> I may just have forgotten them, though (2005 was a long time ago). Yeah, good point :-) There was Bloglines. It is still there, only difference being - it's a ghost town now. There used to be FeedDemon's own sync and now FeedDemon is jumping into the pyre with Reader. It's been long and I am out of example. Maybe others will bring some. But thing in this way - " because when the company launched Google Reader in 2…
Re: Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
#86If you're that upset about it, then what do you really want from the tech world? A world where no service is ever killed or changed in a way that makes it less useful to you? We wouldn't have all of the awesome stuff that we have now if thousands of companies weren't willing to kill or change stuff that was unprofitable and take a chance on something new. At least Google is being pretty nice about it - we have months of notice and easy ways to get our feed lists out of Reader. They could have just up and pulled the plug without telling anyone or giving anyone a chance to get data out. Lots of services have been killed in just that way before.
Personally, I'm waiting a few weeks for all of the other services to settle down and get used to the massive traffic influx. After that, I expect I'll find something better than Reader and get used to that. And then that will be killed someday too, and I'll have to find yet another thing. Life goes on.
Re: Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
#87Re: Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
You realise there were feed services that went kaput because of Reader[1] and one fine day Google decided to give it an injection. Is it really that difficult to see this happening to sth like Evernote or Simplenote? I mean seeing Google's reach it's very much possible. And as Malik has raised the question in his post - what's in it for Google? No one seems to know this. They might just be testing one of their APIs b…
What is "sth"? Services? Software?
Re: Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
So how does that help me if I want to sync iCal with Google Calendar? Addendum: The way I read that form, they will only consider whitelisting apps if the developers ask for it. As a user, I'm still screwed.
Seems practically a given that Apple iCal and iOS will be whitelisted by Google as clients. Even Windows Phone 8 has that confirmed: http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/15/google-caldav-support-sti...
In any case, if they're committed to preserving this feature then why are they implementing screening?
Re: Sorry Google; you can Keep it to yourself
#90Google Reader had an easy and clear migration path to export your data. I can't understand why people keep bashing Google for it. Just take your data to somewhere else. If tomorrow Keep goes away they'll do the same.
Google Reader had an easy and clear migration path to export your data. It's not just about the data: it's about the habits and familiarity surrounding the process of using the data. In RSS, I've been using NetNewsWire for years, even though it's basically abandon-ware and has really fallen behind. Why do I keep using it? Because it works okay, and when I've tried to switch—most recently to DevonTHINK PRO—I've gone b…