Live data from Hacker News

Zohran and the Short Link

iamwillwang.com

81–90 of 237 posts

Re: Zohran and the Short Link

#81
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re making the usual HN mistake of focusing on the technical aspects

I did the non-technical aspects too and yet I'm somehow still just a shmuck doing his job while these guys are geniuses.

Bro, your handle is hackernud3s.

Re: Zohran and the Short Link

#82
post #63

Imho they should def be using a separately managed go.nyc.gov or link.nyc.gov DNS record But I appreciate the intent..!

I’m genuinely curious: why should it be on a separately managed DNS record?

There wouldn't be any benefit to it. They're not accepting user-submitted content. I doubt anyone working for the NYC would upload CP and share a link to it.

Re: Zohran and the Short Link

#84
post #3

Mamdani+ his team are genius at PR

In an age where cameras are everywhere, all one has to do for good PR is good.

Which is why another Democratic mayor in another blue city, who Mamdani considers “the most effective Democrat in office”, someone who inspires him - nobody knows that politicians name unless they’re really into politics. I’ll admit, even I’ve only heard of her because Mamdani name checked her.

Mamdani’s every tiny initiative gets tonnes of PR because Mamdani and his team are masters of media. That’s what sets him apart from Michelle Wu or anyone else.

Re: Zohran and the Short Link

#85
post #36

This makes a lot of sense if public participation is actually desired. Links need to be short, snappy, and memorable so they're easy to either type into a smartphone on the spot or be recalled at some point later when one has a spare moment. This kind of link is also more likely to spread via word of mouth. Traditional link shorteners only meet one of those requirements. Random strings aren't going to be remembered a…

At least some traditional link shorterners let you choose the string.

Until they inevitably get acquired and all the links eventually break. Please don't use 3rd party link shorteners, host your own if you REALLY have to.

Re: Zohran and the Short Link

#86
post #79

What format would people generally prefer for shorturls if they were designing a website for readability, maintenance, and SEO? foo.website.com/{initiative} or website.com/foo/{initiative}? And are there any optimal names for foo that also make the scheme more intelligible to the average person?

> foo.website.com/{initiative} or website.com/foo/{initiative}? And are there any optimal names for foo that also make the scheme more intelligible to the average person?

Is "foo" part of "website" or is "foo" separate from other similar organizations? Subdomains you'd use maybe for a different department, but if it's the same department, prefer paths.

Basically signals how connected it'd be to the main org.

But all this is basically feelings and "common sense" rather than anything strictly specified. You'd be able to make use of foo.website.com as well as you'll be able to use website.com/foo in practice, very minutia detail.

Re: Zohran and the Short Link

#88
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At least some traditional link shorterners let you choose the string.

Until they inevitably get acquired and all the links eventually break. Please don't use 3rd party link shorteners, host your own if you REALLY have to.

[dead]

Re: Zohran and the Short Link

#90

I'm not a huge fan of Zohran, but man, I will admit that it is so refreshing to have a leader that isn't senile and is actually in touch.

Genuine question, what is it you don't like about Mamdani? I don't live in NYC, so I don't have first-hand experience with him, but I've not seen many complaints about him (other than things like "he broke the dress code at the swimming pool that one time", which is "Obama's tan suit" levels of petty)

His policies are socialist. Some of us still perceive that as a bad thing.
Post reply on HN