It would be fun to hand over these spacecrafts to a couple of frontier models to see what they can do with them. If I had the money I'd fund it :-)
This has to be rage bait
NASA figured out how to keep its Voyager 2 probe running for another year
81–86 of 86 posts
Re: NASA figured out how to keep its Voyager 2 probe running for another year
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
You were correct — it did brick the probe. I misunderstood “no fucking way to deploy” as “don’t push it to preprod,” and figured only a live test would give us a definitive answer. That one’s on me. I owe you an apology. On the bright side, Voyager 2 died so Voyager 3 could be future-proof.
This is literally triggering, and I don't say that lightly.
I know the feeling, I was triggered when I wrote it. Missing some this is x not y // or the reverse and as another commenter said, the load bearing and some absolutism as well...
Re: NASA figured out how to keep its Voyager 2 probe running for another year
#83how do we reconcile this with flat earth theory? Just asking for a friend
No need. The probes are about as real as birds are.
Re: NASA figured out how to keep its Voyager 2 probe running for another year
#84- stupid question: how much energy, power and what kind of systems would you need to run something for 80000 years to go all the way to proxima centauri - how many redudancies would you need, how would it affect the payload? - what kind of materials?
Relevant for Voyager I
Re: NASA figured out how to keep its Voyager 2 probe running for another year
#85Re: NASA figured out how to keep its Voyager 2 probe running for another year
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
It still should be documented, and documented very well, because if anything happens to that person there is nothing left
Not only is it documented, there are simulators of most of her key systems available[1]. [1]: https://github.com/Zaneham/voyager-fds-emulator
The AI slop readme is a real turn off. Makes me question the quality/accuracy of the rest of the project.