Live data from Hacker News

Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

marlerblog.com

81–90 of 283 posts

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#82
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The WalMart Waltons are a "family" At the core, "Family-owned" just means nepotism is preferred over merit. (The mob is also "Family-owned")

SpaceX is more “family owned” than Walmart.

That doesn't seem at odds with what they said. The Waltons are a family, which illustrates the point of what a fully "family-owned" business might look like compared to one with external shareholders pretty directly. I don't think it's that hard to understand that giving the Walton's 100% of the stock seems unlikely to address any concerns people have with Walmart, which is evidence of their point that maybe "family-owned" is a red herring.

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's crazy how nothing has been done in the US about this. I got an egg allergy in my late 20s, I had never thought about it before and now eating at restaurants is such a hassle. Even the delivery apps seem to have zero affordances for food allergies, at least with a restaurant you can get some assurance by asking the staff.

I’m very sorry to hear that, but I don’t think restaurants have to be forced to deal with that. The only thing I could support is “if revenue >X then allergen disclosure is mandatory”. I know personally multiple little shops that had to refuse customers, because that’s extra hassle and responsibility that they can’t afford to deal with.

They manage fine in Europe. It’s a cultural issue. If you can’t be arsed working through the minor administrative hassle once (how often do you change the menu..) to not kill your customers then you shouldn’t be in this business.

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#84
post #3

Marketing blogspam by an ambulance chasing attorney who stands to make a lot of money from this if public perception moves a certain way.

Commercial insurance means whatever action they do or don't do is ultimately irrelevant. The supplier will re-brand under another name when things quiet down, proceed to continue selling product, and deduct any capital loss over a year or two.

Global weather changes means more tropical pests and pathogens are migrating north. People are literally on fire, and shitting their pants in excitement. =3

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#86
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't the "explosive" superfluous? Isn't all diarrhea explosive? Has anyone had "unexplosive" diarrhea? Or what aspect of the ordinance renders it "explosive"? And the cause is essentially exposure of the foodstuffs (in this case, likely leafy greens) to feces? So poop causes poop. Who pooped in my salad :(

No, from what I have heard "explosive" isn't being treated with enough weight. Not all diarrhea is "explosive". This is worse than your average food poisoning from everything i've read (luckily, no personal experience so far).

>No, from what I have heard "explosive" isn't being treated with enough weight.

Hmm I had not heard this, that is concerning. Thank you for sharing. No more salad for me, thanks.

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#87
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are food labels required to identify where they're sourced from? I don't think so?

The new QR codes (to replace the 2D UPCs) that manufacturers and merchants are moving to will contain source information and even which lot it came from.

That's bad ass

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#88
post #17

GPTZero "AI" score for this post: 100%

Why should I put any stock in what some snake oil "AI detector" says?

It seems plausible that someone could make a decent discriminator for distinguishing human text from AI text. I wouldn't immediately discount the idea.

Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Restaurants don't even have to track and disclose what allergens their food contains.

Good. Restaurants are hectic to work in. Menus can change quickly, and many dishes are being cooked and prepped at once. Cross contamination chances are high, so if a restaurant MUST say an allergen is not in X,Y,Z they basically can't have it in their restaurant at all.

In forty years I have very rarely seen menus change substantially.

If you are working with food you should know about allergies. It just comes with the territory. I’m baffled by how this is somehow too hard for US folks yet we manage fine.

Post reply on HN