Live data from Hacker News

The Computational Theory of Mind (2015)

plato.stanford.edu

81–82 of 82 posts

Re: The Computational Theory of Mind (2015)

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Evolution is very far from just being natural selection. It’s a quite complicated field with many mechanisms. And when simulated on a computer we have not gotten anything similar to real biology yet. So we have more to learn.

No. Only 3 mechanics: replication, mutation and natural selection. Write a weasel program and you will see for yourself. current = "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX" target = "THE LORD OF THE RINGS" loop { replicas = replication(current) replicas = mutation(replicas) current = naturalSelection(replicas) print("generation", i, current) if (current == target) break } You can thus make "Dog" turn into a "Cat". I rest my case :)

https://open.maricopa.edu/environmentalscience/chapter/mecha...

your example is intelligent design, not evolution. it has the telos baked in

Re: The Computational Theory of Mind (2015)

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Having an internal representation doesn’t imply an English sentence exists. Temple Grandin's written about "thinking in pictures". Language is lossy. For a doctor, the question, how much does it hurt, on a scale from 1-10? is the best we can do.

Appealing to some authority won't rescue you as information theory doesn't work by arbitrary authority figures. Thinking computational theory is about hurt is a joke. Resorting to feelings signifies lack of technical substance. Language is precise or lossy depending on granularity. Haven't you seen a png file in a computer. Visuals are symbols buddy. Hence representable in language.

> Visuals are symbols buddy.

that's a weaker claim than "every human thought can be written as a sentence."

Post reply on HN