Live data from Hacker News

The AI industry is pouring millions into US elections

bloodinthemachine.com

81–87 of 87 posts

Re: The AI industry is pouring millions into US elections

#81
post #73

Probably a sign that it is past time to tightly regulate all AI-aligned companies and their products to set up guard rails to prevent this level of corruption. I am a person who lives in a state where it is totally legal for lobbyists to walk the floor of the state legislature handing out envelopes of cash to any representative who will line up behind their proposed legislation. Bribery buys state laws here and it bu…

I am very curious- what state?

Texas

Re: The AI industry is pouring millions into US elections

#82
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If your business is large enough, if you don't donate to politicians, they will target your business. The government is massive and inserts itself into business operations all the time. The inevitable results happen.

There ARE regulations for sure. But they exist to protect the population at large. For example, food safety laws were not created out of government hostility but rather because food was unsafe. Read (or read about) The Jungle by Upton Sinclair if you want to get creeped out about the food industry in the 1930s before regulations

Are you suggesting that government use of power is always benevolent?

Consider the enormous difficulty and expense people in Palisades have getting permits to rebuild.

Yes, I read "The Jungle". It's a work of fiction, not a documentary. So is "The Grapes of Wrath".

Re: The AI industry is pouring millions into US elections

#83

"Voting with your Wallet" - the American way.

The problem is you can’t really limit money without limiting speech. Perhaps it’s still in the public interest to do so, but the constitution doesn’t allow it.

There is only one country where money is considered speech.

It is very abnormal, and is legal bribery.

Re: The AI industry is pouring millions into US elections

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is you can’t really limit money without limiting speech. Perhaps it’s still in the public interest to do so, but the constitution doesn’t allow it.

There is only one country where money is considered speech. It is very abnormal, and is legal bribery.

Other countries also don’t have the first amendment.

Yet they still have paid political ads. All political advertisements arent banned in other countries. Should they be?

Re: The AI industry is pouring millions into US elections

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Comparing almonds to elections might be my new favorite way of saying "comparing apples to oranges".

But the comparison is of money spent

money spent ON X. Where X is almonds or elections.

Re: The AI industry is pouring millions into US elections

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But the comparison is of money spent

money spent ON X. Where X is almonds or elections.

Yes but the point of the phrase "apples to oranges" is that they are hard to compare. But if you comparing something they both have and is easily measurable, such as sugar, then yes you should compare apples to oranges!
Post reply on HN