"It's built so that if something looks wrong, you can change it yourself without spending hours reading tutorials and watching coding videos" Does anyone do this? Every none coder I know just has llms build everything for them - can't imagine why they'd be looking up coding tutorials for a homepage.
Kiki – a tiny homepage construction kit with a small footprint
81–90 of 93 posts
Re: Kiki – a tiny homepage construction kit with a small footprint
#82This is a tangent to this post, but... I happen to have a cat named Kiki who looks rather like the mascot for this project. Her health is failing, now. I just spent the night on my living room floor next to her. I'll, likely have to put her down, today. I might use this project to make a memorial page for her. https://ibb.co/7dRCnWrp https://ibb.co/1GWwDKLY
For what it's worth, a random person on the internet just shed a tear for the both of you.
Re: Kiki – a tiny homepage construction kit with a small footprint
#83The best part of the no-build, small-footprint approach is longevity: no dependency rot, nothing to maintain, and it'll still open and run in ten years. We've half-forgotten that "view source and hack it" is how a lot of us learned the web in the first place. Good to see tools that lean back into that.
Re: Kiki – a tiny homepage construction kit with a small footprint
#84The design philosophy says you should be able to repair your own tools, but this is closed source proprietary software. Cute page, but does not walk the walk.
I'm not going to blame you _too_ much, since I had similar suspicion, but you could have (as I did) just downloaded the .zip file and examined the contents. In the shareware version, some things are probably missing (I think not all themes are there), but otherwise it's just a bunch of PHP files, no obfuscation or anything. The markup language is configured in a text file, and the parser for that file is just next to…
Open source means free software, which is a license that allows unrestricted use of the source code. Shareware isn’t free (as in speech OR as in beer) software.
The definition of OSS is well defined, and isn’t my definition. This is why there is a term called “OSI-approved license”.
Re: Kiki – a tiny homepage construction kit with a small footprint
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
A fair amount of software follows the model but does not use the term, everytime I go on the play store to look for an app I encounter many that offer a free version with limited features.
The term doesn't make much sense anymore because we don't share software, we just download it from the source. The business model makes more sense than ever, though.
Re: Kiki – a tiny homepage construction kit with a small footprint
#86The best part of the no-build, small-footprint approach is longevity: no dependency rot, nothing to maintain, and it'll still open and run in ten years. We've half-forgotten that "view source and hack it" is how a lot of us learned the web in the first place. Good to see tools that lean back into that.
Maybe I'm not reading this right, but it has its own markup language called "Bug". This is the opposite of no-rot. If it's using technologies you've never heard of before, who is going to be around to maintain them in 10 years?
Re: Kiki – a tiny homepage construction kit with a small footprint
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not going to blame you _too_ much, since I had similar suspicion, but you could have (as I did) just downloaded the .zip file and examined the contents. In the shareware version, some things are probably missing (I think not all themes are there), but otherwise it's just a bunch of PHP files, no obfuscation or anything. The markup language is configured in a text file, and the parser for that file is just next to…
Just because you can see the source code does not make it open source. Shareware software is proprietary software. Open source means free software, which is a license that allows unrestricted use of the source code. Shareware isn’t free (as in speech OR as in beer) software. The definition of OSS is well defined, and isn’t my definition. This is why there is a term called “OSI-approved license”.
Re: Kiki – a tiny homepage construction kit with a small footprint
#88This is a tangent to this post, but... I happen to have a cat named Kiki who looks rather like the mascot for this project. Her health is failing, now. I just spent the night on my living room floor next to her. I'll, likely have to put her down, today. I might use this project to make a memorial page for her. https://ibb.co/7dRCnWrp https://ibb.co/1GWwDKLY
Re: Kiki – a tiny homepage construction kit with a small footprint
#89that font color is impossible to read on the black background I'm guessing this is made for a specific audience who dig this type of UI
Re: Kiki – a tiny homepage construction kit with a small footprint
#90PHP was and still is the best.
I dunno, PHP seems to have a lot of foot-guns. include $_GET[...], register_globals, magic quotes, extract($_REQUEST), weak comparisons, loose typing, eval, risky file upload defaults/patterns, preg_replace /e, dangerous deserialization gadget chains, path traversal into includes, and the whole "URLs can be file paths" abstraction... PHP is basically "RCE-as-a-Service" as far as I'm concerned. Allowing a URL in any f…