Earlier quoted context omitted.
I quit reading after the first paragraph when I saw this pattern: "Not X, not y, not z, A!" The overly emotional paragraph headlines were also off putting.
> "Not X, not y, not z, A!" You know, humans do that sometimes as well. Not GenAI's, not Agents, not automated systems, but actual humans!
AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn
81–90 of 117 posts
Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn
#82The way the author thanks the person from AWS who helped him with a human approach is an AI generated article blaming AWS for using AI. Brilliant.
> Not AI-generated. Not everyone is born writing flawless English. If it sounds like an LLM, maybe it is because people like me had to learn how to write clearly from LLMs because English is not our first language. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44774474
> Yes, i used AI to resort it [..]
Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
> "Not X, not y, not z, A!" You know, humans do that sometimes as well. Not GenAI's, not Agents, not automated systems, but actual humans!
Sometimes! But when the cost of generating pages upon pages of bombastic text is near-zero, I have to apply quick heuristics to decide which text by people I don't personally know is worth my time to read in detail, and this article doesn't pass.
Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn
#84The way the author thanks the person from AWS who helped him with a human approach is an AI generated article blaming AWS for using AI. Brilliant.
> Not AI-generated. Not everyone is born writing flawless English. If it sounds like an LLM, maybe it is because people like me had to learn how to write clearly from LLMs because English is not our first language. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44774474
> Yes, i used AI to resort it,
It may be not "generated", as in it's a true story, but the writing is AI.
Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn
#85Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn
#86The way the author thanks the person from AWS who helped him with a human approach is an AI generated article blaming AWS for using AI. Brilliant.
> Not AI-generated. Not everyone is born writing flawless English. If it sounds like an LLM, maybe it is because people like me had to learn how to write clearly from LLMs because English is not our first language. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44774474
Also, you've cut out the part where he says he did use AI, but just to "resort" the article (by which I assume he means "reorganize"). Whether one believes that is gonna be a judgment call I suppose.
Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn
#87The way the author thanks the person from AWS who helped him with a human approach is an AI generated article blaming AWS for using AI. Brilliant.
> Not AI-generated. Not everyone is born writing flawless English. If it sounds like an LLM, maybe it is because people like me had to learn how to write clearly from LLMs because English is not our first language. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44774474
Most LLM copy-paste accounts will deny it when called out.
Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
> "Not X, not y, not z, A!" You know, humans do that sometimes as well. Not GenAI's, not Agents, not automated systems, but actual humans!
Sometimes! But when the cost of generating pages upon pages of bombastic text is near-zero, I have to apply quick heuristics to decide which text by people I don't personally know is worth my time to read in detail, and this article doesn't pass.
The 'not a, not b, but c' writing style used to be _effective_. If someone wrote that way I paid attention because it was good writing. But because it is everywhere now, it has ceased to be effective, and it has the opposite effect. My mental heuristic sees this and zones out now.
Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn
#89If you're in a position like that, better start thinking about plan B cos it isn't getting any better.
Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn
#90A challenging writing style on a really difficult to read page with a sloppy AI header image means that this article was a not a great experience.
Extremely difficult to read when it's completely broken in Firefox (Focus at least).