Live data from Hacker News

AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn

seuros.com

81–90 of 117 posts

Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I quit reading after the first paragraph when I saw this pattern: "Not X, not y, not z, A!" The overly emotional paragraph headlines were also off putting.

> "Not X, not y, not z, A!" You know, humans do that sometimes as well. Not GenAI's, not Agents, not automated systems, but actual humans!

Humans do it sometimes, for effect. Not all the time, giving every phrase the same impact.

Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn

#82

The way the author thanks the person from AWS who helped him with a human approach is an AI generated article blaming AWS for using AI. Brilliant.

> Not AI-generated. Not everyone is born writing flawless English. If it sounds like an LLM, maybe it is because people like me had to learn how to write clearly from LLMs because English is not our first language. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44774474

You cut off the part where he says he did "use AI to resort it".

> Yes, i used AI to resort it [..]

Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "Not X, not y, not z, A!" You know, humans do that sometimes as well. Not GenAI's, not Agents, not automated systems, but actual humans!

Sometimes! But when the cost of generating pages upon pages of bombastic text is near-zero, I have to apply quick heuristics to decide which text by people I don't personally know is worth my time to read in detail, and this article doesn't pass.

Fair enough. I just wouldn't lean on one single "tell" like that to judge an entire article, at least not as a general rule. But that's just me.

Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn

#84

The way the author thanks the person from AWS who helped him with a human approach is an AI generated article blaming AWS for using AI. Brilliant.

> Not AI-generated. Not everyone is born writing flawless English. If it sounds like an LLM, maybe it is because people like me had to learn how to write clearly from LLMs because English is not our first language. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44774474

from the same post

> Yes, i used AI to resort it,

It may be not "generated", as in it's a true story, but the writing is AI.

Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn

#86

The way the author thanks the person from AWS who helped him with a human approach is an AI generated article blaming AWS for using AI. Brilliant.

> Not AI-generated. Not everyone is born writing flawless English. If it sounds like an LLM, maybe it is because people like me had to learn how to write clearly from LLMs because English is not our first language. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44774474

That comment appears to be from 9 months ago, regarding an entirely different article.

Also, you've cut out the part where he says he did use AI, but just to "resort" the article (by which I assume he means "reorganize"). Whether one believes that is gonna be a judgment call I suppose.

Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn

#87

The way the author thanks the person from AWS who helped him with a human approach is an AI generated article blaming AWS for using AI. Brilliant.

> Not AI-generated. Not everyone is born writing flawless English. If it sounds like an LLM, maybe it is because people like me had to learn how to write clearly from LLMs because English is not our first language. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44774474

The article is clearly AI written. You can also see in their account history where they’re switching between their own writing style or copy and pasting from an LLM.

Most LLM copy-paste accounts will deny it when called out.

Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "Not X, not y, not z, A!" You know, humans do that sometimes as well. Not GenAI's, not Agents, not automated systems, but actual humans!

Sometimes! But when the cost of generating pages upon pages of bombastic text is near-zero, I have to apply quick heuristics to decide which text by people I don't personally know is worth my time to read in detail, and this article doesn't pass.

100% agree with this. The irony of this article critical of AI development culture is that the author used AI to write it.

The 'not a, not b, but c' writing style used to be _effective_. If someone wrote that way I paid attention because it was good writing. But because it is everywhere now, it has ceased to be effective, and it has the opposite effect. My mental heuristic sees this and zones out now.

Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn

#89
I'm surprised these companies still have people on devrel, it always felt like the easiest layoff to do as its very hard to tie direct results to devrel work.

If you're in a position like that, better start thinking about plan B cos it isn't getting any better.

Re: AWS Fired the One Employee Who Gave a Damn

#90
post #2

A challenging writing style on a really difficult to read page with a sloppy AI header image means that this article was a not a great experience.

Extremely difficult to read when it's completely broken in Firefox (Focus at least).

Reader mode seems to salvage most of it. Though I will never understand why people mess with basic operations like scrolling.
Post reply on HN