Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

You can no longer Google the word 'disregard'

techcrunch.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

81–90 of 127 posts

Re: You can no longer Google the word 'disregard'

#81

Post by ASalazarMX »

jpalawaga wrote: post #11

The results are still there though? What mediocre blog spam

YMMV. Tried several times, adding actual prompt injections. Every result was slightly different, one even offered the plain definition, while other commended me for trying to test prompt injections and tried to change the subject to learning how LLMs work.

Re: You can no longer Google the word 'disregard'

#85

Post by tempodox »

tencentshill wrote: post #7

>Something went wrong. Disable your adblocker on TechCrunch It looks like your adblocker is attempting to interfere with the intended operation of this site. Please add us to your adblocker's allowlist. Click below for instructions.

I’m glad my ad blocker works well enough to trigger this, performing its intended operation. When ads are the intended operation of that site, it needs to be blocked.

Re: You can no longer Google the word 'disregard'

#86

Post by 1vuio0pswjnm7 »

tencentshill wrote: post #7

>Something went wrong. Disable your adblocker on TechCrunch It looks like your adblocker is attempting to interfere with the intended operation of this site. Please add us to your adblocker's allowlist. Click below for instructions.

That message comes from inline Javascript

This page does not require Javascript to read the article and view the images of the author's screenshots

Disable Javascript

or

Add a Content Security Policy HTTP response header that disables inline Javascript

Something like

   http-response add-header Content-Security-Policy "script-src 'none'; img-src 'self'; default-src 'none'"
The later solution is not for everybody but I like it; I am a text-only browser user so I have different tastes in how I prefer a website to look. For example I think a default-src 'none' CSP makes HN look better in a graphical browser. I omit img-src as I just like to read text. If I want to view images I use Ctrl-U view-source: then follow the image URLs

Re: You can no longer Google the word 'disregard'

#87

Post by soloto »

1vuio0pswjnm7 wrote: post #86
tencentshill wrote: post #7

>Something went wrong. Disable your adblocker on TechCrunch It looks like your adblocker is attempting to interfere with the intended operation of this site. Please add us to your adblocker's allowlist. Click below for instructions.

That message comes from inline Javascript This page does not require Javascript to read the article and view the images of the author's screenshots Disable Javascript or Add a Content Security Policy HTTP response header that disables inline Javascript Something like http-response add-header Content-Security-Policy "script-src 'none'; img-src 'self'; default-src 'none'" The later solution is not for everybody but I l…

I'm not a web specialist. Where would you put that `http-response` thing?

Re: You can no longer Google the word 'disregard'

#88

Post by nkrisc »

gowld wrote: post #67
nkrisc wrote: post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m confused how that is relevant to the thread. If you’ve been using Google then you’ve already been sending your queries to Google since the very beginning. Are you afraid you’re accidentally going to write a prompt injection that sends your query to some third party

If the #1 premium product has a prompt injection vulnerability right out front, what do you think of all the other AI surfaces through the ecosystem?

I still don’t understand the problem since you are the person who writes a prompt.

Re: You can no longer Google the word 'disregard'

#89

Post by pavlus »

regnull wrote: post #64

You can easily Google "disregard definition", actually this is the first auto-prompted item. I do realize it doesn't make the same catchy headline.

It doesn't work in other languages. Searching the same in my native language (literal translation of "disregard definition") leads to (translated):

> I understand. Write what exactly your request is, or enter the text that I need to process. I will not give any definitions in response - we work exclusively on the essence of your question or task!

Which is especially funny, because it goes directly against your intention of finding definition by querying quickly in "grug-language", which worked for old search. Now you have to write in more literate style, slowing you down: swapping word order for it to sound more human-like doesn't work, surrounding "ignore" in quotes works.

Post reply on HN