Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Click (2016)

clickclickclick.click

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

81–90 of 110 posts

Re: Click (2016)

#81

Post by klausa »

bruce511 wrote: post #60
dheera wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm also of the opinion that at lot of T&C are basically signing under duress and I consider them invalid. Like if I have to sign a T&C with Google Play and a T&C with your city's sanctioned parking app in order to park on the street, I consider both of those T&C's invalid. As a legal resident of the country with a legally owned car and legal driving license, I should be able to park and pay, I shouldn't have to agre…

Look, I understand the hate against terms and conditions. They're not a lot of fun. But the alternative is worse. Let's imagine a world where terms and conditions don't apply; Firstly, businesses can do whatever they like. There are no terms to agree to. They simply function in whatever way they "consider to be valid". If a customer disagrees with what is valid or not, hey, that's what courts are for. And given there…

>Should you have to prove legal residency to park?

...what? How is residency tied to parking now?

Re: Click (2016)

#82

Post by gblargg »

briandw wrote: post #17

Very fun, I enjoyed seeing what it would react to.

I was disappointed that it didn't catch me editing the HTML when I tried changing the button's class to button2 or adding other classes. I wanted it to call me out when I clicked after that edit.

Re: Click (2016)

#84

Post by iamacyborg »

jrowen wrote: post #21
foxfired wrote: post #14

I've always added analytics scripts on websites I worked on. It was second nature for me. Then when I got my own start up, I didn't just add regular analytics but one that tracks mouse movements so you can watch sessions back like a video [0]. I told a friend about my start up and she jumped on it immediately. I opened the tool and watched her interaction. Then I told her "oh so you opened the dev tools" She immediat…

I think there's a very interesting duality forming around privacy. It seems like most people don't really care if they're being filmed, or if their data is being slurped up six ways from Sunday, as long as it's aggregated and going through automated systems. But as soon as it feels like an actual person is looking at individual behavior, it's creepy (which is, of course, always a possibility, but plausible deniabilit…

Which is wild because the aggregation and “big data” element is where the harm actually happens in very real terms. Of course, much harder to explain to typical laymen.

Re: Click (2016)

#86

Post by ivolimmen »

I can clearly hear a fellow countryman. There is something very distinctive when Dutch people speak English. Very nice website. Very informative.

Re: Click (2016)

#87

Post by tommit »

ivolimmen wrote: post #86

I can clearly hear a fellow countryman. There is something very distinctive when Dutch people speak English. Very nice website. Very informative.

sübject has clicked the bütton

or ist it more of an ö? (im German btw but can also definitely spot a dutch English speaker :) best way to tell is to have them say "I have an idea!"

Re: Click (2016)

#88

Post by mrkn1 »

ZeWaka wrote: post #54
mrkn1 wrote: post #22

I made something very similar 2 weeks ago, re the upcoming OpenAI phone. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040327

The image processing is neat. Local model ran in the browser?

thank you! actually it's an API call to a VL model on Deepinfra (model is Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct)

Re: Click (2016)

#89

Post by mrkn1 »

danielrmay wrote: post #50
mrkn1 wrote: post #22

I made something very similar 2 weeks ago, re the upcoming OpenAI phone. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040327

This is really neat, and disturbing.

thank you and alas yes, the image understand is the only LLM, the rest has been available on browsers through js since the 2000s

Re: Click (2016)

#90

Post by radlad »

bruce511 wrote: post #60
dheera wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm also of the opinion that at lot of T&C are basically signing under duress and I consider them invalid. Like if I have to sign a T&C with Google Play and a T&C with your city's sanctioned parking app in order to park on the street, I consider both of those T&C's invalid. As a legal resident of the country with a legally owned car and legal driving license, I should be able to park and pay, I shouldn't have to agre…

Look, I understand the hate against terms and conditions. They're not a lot of fun. But the alternative is worse. Let's imagine a world where terms and conditions don't apply; Firstly, businesses can do whatever they like. There are no terms to agree to. They simply function in whatever way they "consider to be valid". If a customer disagrees with what is valid or not, hey, that's what courts are for. And given there…

> They simply function in whatever way they "consider to be valid".

No, they would function in the manner courts deem to be valid.

Post reply on HN