Earlier quoted context omitted.
My solution to your initial problem is to have a "note to recruiters" linked prominently at the top of my resume (and linkedin). It covers what kind of places I'd be a good fit for and vice versa. Things like I am not going to update the recruiter's database, tell me company names, small companies/startups etc. It becomes very apparent very quickly which recruiters have made any effort to read it and if they can't do…
I once had some programming languages listed on my resume that I didn't substantiate there. The actual meaning of that was "this resume will overflow one or two pages if I list everything I ever did to know every language I know." Now I have LinkedIn for that.
Why won't anyone talk to me? What recruiters look for in a resume
81–83 of 83 posts
Re: Why won't anyone talk to me? What recruiters look for in a resume
#82I mostly - for seniors - look in the experience and what projects the person did. I don't believe any skills in a skill section. This is the first screening, followed by a programming task during the the telephone interview, interview with me, interviews with developers, followed by practical programming work. So yes it is important to get through the CV screen (have experience), but it's only the first step. Side no…
How do you select Juniors then if the CV is mostly irrelevant? Do you go by github profile?
I invite more of them.
Re: Why won't anyone talk to me? What recruiters look for in a resume
#83"If you’ve had five jobs in the last five years, why should the recruiter think this time will be different?" Maybe because who is hiring is supposed to be better than the others? There are far too many terrible companies, especially the big ones, and honestly I would never stay in a company just for the sake of it. If recruiters think that this is a problem, it means that who is hiring is not confident enough or wor…
If it's only one short term job, it's totally ok. Two is ok but I will ask why. Three+ is a negative. 5+ short term jobs is pretty much no hire unless there is a very good explanation. There are no perfect companies and people have to compromise.
I do understand that recruiters have to place people and they don't really mind/understand if the company is good or not but I can't see why this should be our problem.