.
Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
81–90 of 284 posts
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#82After skimming through the article: Why not just write everything through an AI? (to obfuscate your "style")
Article:
> To avoid this, you will probably need to intentionally write in a very different style than you usually do (or to have AIs rewrite all your prose for you, but, ugh, that’s not a world I look forward to living in).
I agree. The amount of vague and cliche'd AI writing I read on the daily is already exhausting enough.
It would be interesting if you could train a model to sprinkle random red herrings throughout your text in a minimally disruptive way. But I fear you might have to stretch the definition of "minimally disruptive" to make it robust against detection.
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#83It works for me to: https://www.jefftk.com/p/automated-deanonymization-is-here
Of course most people have written much less online than Kelsey or I have, but I expect this will keep on. Don't trust the future to keep your secrets safe.
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#84[flagged]
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#85.
She says she has memory disabled. I don’t think Kelsey is technologically illiterate.
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#86Could this be just memory? Not clear it actually isn’t
[deleted]
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#87.
> Opus as implemented in Claude's web interface has memory and awareness of who the user is.
Kelsey knows this:
To make sure it wasn’t somehow feeding my account information to Claude even in Incognito Mode, I asked a friend to run these tests on his computer, and he received the same result; I also got the same result when I tested it through the API.
When I tested this with my own writing several LessWrong commenters tested it with the snippets I provided (see comments) and saw that it could identify me: https://www.jefftk.com/p/automated-deanonymization-is-here
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#88Could this be just memory? Not clear it actually isn’t
"I did not have memory enabled, nor did I have information about me associated with my account; I did these tests in Incognito Mode. To make sure it wasn’t somehow feeding my account information to Claude even in Incognito Mode, I asked a friend to run these tests on his computer, and he received the same result; I also got the same result when I tested it through the API." Given those precautions if it is just memor…
[deleted]
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#89.
> Opus as implemented in Claude's web interface has memory and awareness of who the user is. Kelsey knows this: To make sure it wasn’t somehow feeding my account information to Claude even in Incognito Mode, I asked a friend to run these tests on his computer, and he received the same result; I also got the same result when I tested it through the API. When I tested this with my own writing several LessWrong commente…
[deleted]
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#90.
Several others have reproduced this for Kelsey, and she's certainly not technologically illiterate.